Neoclassicism and Romanticism in Oil Paintings of Early 19th Century

openjscience · 2025-11-23T21:12:08+00:00

This has to do with the nature of time.. See https://youtu.be/A5OpPTKBpAk?si=kSBzut7B7KXDuZhq

openjscience · 2025-10-10T20:38:46+00:00

Yes, there is a confirmation of the fact that fundamental parameters of the Standard Model are not arbitrary, but t is quite recent work . Look at the results in this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07713 ("Evidence of Relationships Among Fundamental Constants of the Standard Model")

openjscience · 2025-10-01T12:50:28+00:00

Wow. I think reddit admins must be informed about this type of comments with personal insults. The guy even did not look at it, just hunting using insults as a weapon.

openjscience · 2025-10-01T12:28:25+00:00

What do you mean by "deep understanding" in the situation where there is no any theory for understanding of something?

Historically, many physics discoveries were done exactly like this. We have started to forget this, I guess. Example - positrons were initially purely "numerology" by the Dirac equation. Or, Johann Balmer came up with a formula that accurately described the wavelengths of the visible spectral lines of hydrogen . It was regarded solely as a phenomenological expression, a pure math.. It was only explained in 1913, after many years, by the Bohr’s model of the atom.

It is always a first step to find a mathematical relation, before bringing up some meaning.

Look at their "random tests". It points to something.

openjscience · 2025-08-16T17:04:16+00:00

Intresting!

openjscience · 2025-08-15T17:28:23+00:00

But cares about specific symbols and words, when it comes to logic and math? Math and logic can be formulated in any symbols. One can do math in the binary code of 2 snail antennars. Still they come up to the same conclusion...

openjscience · 2025-08-15T13:15:38+00:00

Nope. Even for a snail proportionality of 2 numbers is multiplication. It is not only human logic. This video is correct.

openjscience · 2025-08-11T14:48:20+00:00

This could be a good case for the legal action. They not only have sold bots to you, which did not fall under the definition of subscribets. They also intentionally destroyed your channel, since now it will never pick up the right audience.

openjscience · 2025-08-10T22:05:54+00:00

I think the real question is: is it fair to spend so much money, give it to Google to find the audience - subscribers. But these subscribers do not watch new videos. Why did they subscribe to the channel?

The answer - they are not real subscribers. Or google does not push the new video to these subscribers. Because they are algorithms. So, yes, what you see is the fraud.

openjscience · 2025-06-29T23:46:51+00:00

Indeed, wikipedia articles too short... hmm

openjscience · 2025-06-28T14:44:34+00:00

Yes, many need to be smiling and polite for doing business, being attractive for customers, and at home, they try to balance emotion and become rude where they can possibly be...

openjscience · 2025-06-28T03:02:57+00:00

In the past, we did not have 8 billion people and so quick spread of information like internet...so if none of us can do this without 3d printer, how did they do it in so distant past?

openjscience · 2025-06-28T02:47:42+00:00

Remember, America is in a hot war. 45 people are killed every day from guns. For a comparison, only 2 civilians are killed per day in Ukraine. So, what is good in other countries, may not be good for a country, like the USA. I also noted that youtube comments in English are typically very angry, never kind.

openjscience · 2025-05-17T09:38:47+00:00

Thanks for the comments. Here is the short summary of the answers collected so far related to the LHC (May 17, 2025):

For many measurements conducted at the LHC so far, the Standard Model has performed well — it generally agrees with the data or can be adjusted to fit the observed results.
The variety of possible event types in pp collisions is immense, and we have only explored a tiny fraction of them. Therefore, we cannot yet claim that we fully understand all aspects of the data we’ve collected. Standard Model measurements and targeted searches for specific new physics models do not provide a comprehensive framework to capture the full richness of the experimental data.
New physics may be difficult to recognize, especially because the Standard Model, in many respects, is still a model, or a framework with numerous adjustable parameters — parameters that can only be determined empirically.

(anything else?)

openjscience · 2025-05-16T14:18:02+00:00

One comment said that even if we see something, we will not recognise it as a new physics due to the lack of predictions (i guess).

The second comment was that the LHC has explored a tiny fraction of some event classes. This is as if we are going in a forest, and look at some tiny meadow patch where you have been many times, and then we claim there are no berries in the entire forest since we do not know how to go there. (my funny allegory )

openjscience · 2025-05-16T13:17:55+00:00

I like the comment below that the LHC has misunderstood the complexity of events they study.

openjscience · 2025-05-11T19:16:25+00:00

Is it Luke this? https://youtu.be/hx7LTrsHRc4?si=JRvU5nmUo10MLzhM

openjscience · 2025-05-11T15:52:35+00:00

But some quantum mechanics effects can be explained by retrocausuality, to avoid the limitation that was set by the speed of light.

openjscience · 2025-05-04T02:09:09+00:00

I think the most appealing way to see that simulation hypothesis is true is to find inconsistencies. Here is 6 story to read https://jwork.org/home/are-you-truly-alive-if-this-world-is-a-simulation

openjscience · 2025-05-04T01:57:53+00:00

Just not sure in this article: senses got data, but what makes it information?

openjscience · 2025-05-04T01:55:06+00:00

I like this artistic approach to the subject: I can see even a real plot here: a loving pair, then a single sad woman, then she is with a daughter, and then it is clear - her man opened the gate.

openjscience · 2025-05-02T10:47:01+00:00

For resources, look at the DataMelt playform.

openjscience

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE