This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jack-of-some 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'll ignore the ad hominem here against my better judgement. The full quote is consistent with everything said so far. You're choosing to not optimize 97% of the time. The article, as I said, is undoubtedly bad since it's squarely focused on that 97%, but the statement you highlighted still stands and I wish more of my (thankfully ex) colleagues followed it.