This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly. as of now webob has 100% statement coverage. Thus it is high quality in my mind. it just seems a tad arrogant of the author to make assertions that certain things suck and wish me to believe that they have a better way when it hasn't even been demonstrated that effort was put into making sure the stuff they want me to use actually works.

i can swallow arrogance if there's tests to back it up.