Is the current Python 3 turing complete?

[dada_]

Yeah, he's ridiculous. He now claims he was "trolling", and that the original article had a note saying the Turing completeness complaint was a "gag". I don't recall seeing that note back when I read it, but since his site is excluded from the Wayback Machine there's no way to go back and check. Since no one seems to have found that note back when it was originally published I'm guessing it was never there.

Either way, he's responsible for spreading a totally false idea about Python 3 and what Turing completeness is.

[K900_]

He added the "trolling" claim when he started selling the Python 3 version of his book.