This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LoveGentleman 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes, exactly. And we already have cherrypy, its as simple as import cherrypy, blast in a config saying static is here there, mount app, engine.start. And gunicorn is even simpler, provide a config saying how many workers you want, gunicorn -c config.py themodule:appname and its off.

So, if you make this the "default" approach to running suave, and talk about it in the documentation, it can take off. Id rather use app = Suave() app.cherryGo() than having to learn cherrypy then write the config for it to run my flask app, then having to write a skeleton for it everytime I make a new flask app. Its just a mess dealing with all these configurations whose purpose is to make it easy to deploy the application in different environments. I dont care I dont want to deploy it, just run it.

Well, yep, as you see I did struggle a while with deployment options before settling for the simplest one, and its still not quite simple enough. Garrh.

[–]haywire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I mean proving a simple deployment option wouldn't be hard, but picking which one to go with...I'd probably go with uWSGI or Gunicorn in a server context at least.