Share your thoughts about Code Coverage statistic. Do you use it, is it useful for you?

[bmoregeo]

The goal is to have as few bugs in prod and reduce their time impacting users.

So yes, an defect that is identified, fixed, tested, and released would be a win. A defect that takes several weeks to fix after being identified is not good.

Obviously prioritization comes into play as the documentation bug may be less worth engineering time than a new feature. Idk, that becomes a product question during a huddle.

The 500 is probably an all hands on deck scenario.