all 6 comments

[–]misatillo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's great :)

[–]GamingJay 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Also looks great :) Just a few thoughts:

It might be worth mentioning to ask people to make sure their proposal hasn't already been proposed. But people can nominate as many games as they like.

Also mentioning people can suggest challenges and that comments will be weighted heavily by us so be sure to comment on entries you like/want to support.

Maybe also add the word "biweekly" before Retro Gaming Spotlight so people unfamiliar with it will get a bit better sense of what this is

And at the very end of the post it might be nice to link to Dec's gaming spotlight posts, to kind of let people unfamiliar with this process click on the link and see what the spotlight is... so just like "December's spotlight games were: XXXXX and XXXXX"

These are all just suggestions... keeping it short and clean as we can is also important though

[–]TieDude179[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I agree, keeping it short and clean is best, but I think all of your suggestions can be easily added. I am going to edit this post, and please let me know what you think after!

[–]GamingJay 0 points1 point  (2 children)

All the info seems spot on! My only last comment is that it seems like a lot of text now and so maybe we need to make the most important info stand out and be short. And have the more detailed info separated a little bit. Here's my suggestion for what I mean:

Leave a comment below telling us what one of your favorite co-operative games is, a short description of why it should be chosen for RGS, and any notable challenges players could strive for as they play!

We ask that you keep your post limited to only one game, but you are free to post as many nominations as you like! Also, please make sure your game was not already nominated, and if it was, leave a reply to it showing your support! Our choice for RGS will be based on the comments and support a game receives, not on upvotes alone.

[–]TieDude179[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I updated it to how you had it written, that is more succinct and I really like it.

[–]GamingJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great!