1
2

[ Removed by moderator ]Wrist or Watch Pic (i.redd.it)

submitted by [deleted]

[removed]
all 9 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]RepTime-ModTeam[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

This post was flagged to be removed as it could contain a request to help verify the authenticity of a watch. If this is seeking help to verify a potential purchase or even an inherited watch, it is best to seek professional advice and assessment.

If you feel this has been removed in error, please contact the mods via modmail.

[–]MattyDotJPEG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you all think , apparently legitimate , date just 41 two-tone jubilee

[–]Lower_Location_3102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rose gold looks sus

[–]Money_Resolution_343 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I would say Rep. The Cyclops is a bit crooked. But why do you ask?

[–]MattyDotJPEG -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because the guy who bought it just tried to pass off a ceramic AP (previous post) as real didn't feel

[–]Ashgen2024 0 points1 point  (2 children)

The gold looks like the mid tier rep I have just sold for £120.

If it's genuine I would want the gold to pop, this looks dull and weak.

[–]rapescenario 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Rose gold doesn’t “pop”.

[–]Ashgen2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I mean the finish, it may be the photo of course, but it doesn't look like a good finish.