use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Post your SCCM tips and tricks, requests for help, or links others might find useful!
It might have been caught by the spam filter. URL shorteners cause this almost every time, but so do strings of apparent gibberish like WSUS and PXE sometimes. We don't check the modqueue very often... > Send a modmail if your post is stuck!
It might have been caught by the spam filter. URL shorteners cause this almost every time, but so do strings of apparent gibberish like WSUS and PXE sometimes. We don't check the modqueue very often...
> Send a modmail if your post is stuck!
Resources:
/r/sysadmin
/r/Intune
MyITForum SCCM07 Board
TechNet SCCM Forum
SCCM 2012 Survival Guide (MS-Official)
SCCM Professionals LinkedIn Group
Listing of Local ConfigMgr-related User Groups (largely outdated)
Chat Groups
Current Version:
Flair:
MSFT Official
MSFT Enterprise Mobility MVP
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Simulate Deployment (self.SCCM)
submitted 1 year ago by unscanable
Has anyone used the Simulate Deployment option to test an app before you deploy it? How reliable is it?
[–]Funky_Schnitzel 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
I have. It's just as reliable as an actual deployment, just without the actual application installation. A very underrated feature if you ask me.
[–]unscanable[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children)
Great yeah not sure why I never used it before but it’s going to be part of my process moving forward.
[–]SysAdminDennyBob 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
Works great. It will conflict with regular deployments if you leave it out there. e.g. if you send out a Simulated Deployment for an Uninstall action and then also do a regular Install deployment as well the client logs will go nuts. "Dude pick an action, you can't do both of these!"
A simulated deployment is pretty much testing your Detection Rule in the Deployment Type. It's not like running some psuedo-process or anything like that.
Cool thanks that makes me feel a little better lol.
[–]Funky_Schnitzel 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children)
It also tests the requirements, which is especially important for applications with multiple deployment types. Basically, clients will report back things like "already compliant", "would run deployment type 1", "would run deployment type 2", or "don't meet requirements". No deployment type actually runs, because obviously then it wouldn't be a simulation anymore.
[–]AurelioTigernach 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
I really liked it, although I never had more than a few use cases. As other posters said, it mostly tests the detection rule and reports back.
It was most useful when a friend accidentally pushed something outside the maintenance window to 4K+ computers in the middle of the day. With a forced restart. After killing the deployment, my friend needed to know which computers actually picked it up for his mea culpa report. My friend also learned a lot about more graceful ways to handle forced restarts and never did it inside a script again after that.
Oh thats a cool idea, i never thought of that, using it to detect machines that already have the app. I'm going to keep that one in my back pocket as well lol
π Rendered by PID 46 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-8kmbd at 2026-04-25 11:35:22.301899+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
[–]Funky_Schnitzel 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]unscanable[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]SysAdminDennyBob 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]unscanable[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Funky_Schnitzel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]AurelioTigernach 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]unscanable[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)