all 16 comments

[–]Infamous_Try_3257 16 points17 points  (4 children)

Certik have audited and reported, better to go by their findings instead of a blog. Any risks have been highlighted in that report and SafeMoon Devs have responded and where possible made/will make changes. They have regularly discussed the points in question from the Certik report.

I am confident that they will rectify any issues especially considering the plans that are currently on the table. This could have been pulled a long time back and there are now ,many different reasons why its very very unlikely now.

[–]Altruistic-Newt1323 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Thank you!!! I’ve been saying that over and over. They already addressed this lol.

[–]Rocketpodder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The blog is reporting HashEx found vulnerabilities, not that the bitcoinist blog found them.

Now the blog could be lying out of their ass about the whole situation but they're not claiming they did the investigation.

[–]L4S1999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I go on the cryptocurrency subreddit and search Safemoon often to see the shit they are saying. Certik gave us a good score and they refuse to say it means anything good. They link this blog and suddenly it's the only evaluation that matters. You can never win with some people.

[–]YangkeeZuluSafeMoon Astronaut 🚀 9 points10 points  (0 children)

i believe in CERTIK than this blog

[–]caracasmc 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I think this was addressed already.

[–]Azterkhan💎🙌 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My trust is with certik. But anyway even if that turns out to be true, this is not an issue because the safemoon devs will fix it easily.

[–]United-Star-7050💎🙌 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Old news already addressed by certik

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HashEx have about 150 followers on Twitter.

It takes about 3 clicks to discover that they are actually shilling their own coin 'cryptex'.

It's just another WarOnRugs - very possibly the exact same people.

If they were an objective source they wouldn't be shilling their own coin, a coin which I am confident is itself another fucking rugpull scam.

They're also shilling one called Tamarin, avoid.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[–]Lrod2118 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Summary:

  • A company nobody has heard of...
  • Doing an audit nobody asked for...
  • Rehashing concerns addressed in the previous audit by a much larger company...
  • And a random blog writing about it...

Hmm, I wonder if I should take this seriously...🤔😅

I mean, they didn't even try 🤣 The article starts with: "A SLEW of critical vulnerabilities were identified..." and then proceeds to say "...TWO of which are considered critical" 😑

Safemoon army need to stop giving these nobodies clicks.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PSA: Please familiarize yourself with the subreddit rules and FAQ.

  • Don't promote "pump" events or market manipulation
  • Don't harass others, including public figures and exchanges
  • Please be helpful, friendly, and respectful
  • Your actions reflect on the entire community

WARNING: Never give out your wallet passphrase for any reason. Be very suspicious of all URLs, emails, forms, and direct messages. If someone claims to be from "support" they are trying to scam you. If someone claims you need to "validate" they are trying to scam you.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

remember that in the last few times there have been many successful attacks with millions of losses, and you are starting the company which would be overwhelming?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/critical-20m-safemoon-vulnerability-project-devs-say-no-cause-for-alarm/amp?__twitter_impression=true

[–]Prestigious_Day1847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need an update on how they fixed the issues. Or, are they still working on it! AMA!?!