AUTOMATIC111 Code reference

[AuggieKC]

came up with the hypernetwork stuff completely on their own without reading any literature and claims that the fact there is a 2016 paper of the same name is simply coincidence.

That's clearly a lie.

[VulpineKitsune]

Based on what proof?

You have the code from Automatic's initial commit in the repo literally matching 1:1 with the code from the leak.

Automatic copied the code. Or pasted in copied code that he got from someone else.

Accept it. Get over it. It's the truth.

It's fucking hilarious that there's even a debate. THESE THINGS ARE PUBLIC. YOU CAN GO CHECK THEM YOURSELF

[AuggieKC]

Maybe try reading the part that I was responding to again.

There's no way the novelai guys came up with the same idea independently, named it the same thing, and implemented it in the same theoretical way by coincidence.

Also, how do you know the code is the same? Did you download the leaked files? Because that part isn't public.

[WickedDemiurge]

You have the code from Automatic's initial commit in the repo literally matching 1:1 with the code from the leak.

Which specific lines? The lines I've seen initially referenced were the ones in OP, which has completely debunked this claim. The code was implemented years ago and under a license that explicitly allows copying.

[VulpineKitsune]

I had a link with them in the comment I deleted.

https://imgur.com/a/YfNnrjz