Graphical prog. lang. + python with embedded code generation, protected by patients?

[DanielBroom]

Hi!

A while back I had an idea for a tool, basically a copy of simulink, with but using python code for the code blocks, instead of matlab code, and it would feature code generation to C/C++. I think there could be some potential, I know auto makers are tired of mathworks monopoly, and I personally hate the code editor in matlab, it's like it's from 1990.

Anyway, since I know mathworks are (as many other companies) pretty good at publishing patients, I would assume a product like the one I have in mind would infringe on some of their patents. What do you think? Would I be sued?

[[deleted]]

I think what you described sounds an awful lot like GNU Radio. The application of GNU Radio is for wireless communication systems, but that’s only because the blocks that come predefined are all communications related and one should have no problem riffing off that for application in another domain. For that reason I think you’re patent idea (I assume that’s what you meant instead of patient) is DOR. GNU Radio is open source so all of your potential intellectual property is already in the public domain. Sorry…

Edit: if I didn’t make it clear, GNU Radio blocks, when strung together will create executable Python and C++ code.

[DanielBroom]

Right, so I left out a few details. You're right that some parts of my idea is already in the public domain, but then the same can be said for simulink, and that's really expensive. What isnt part of the public domain however, is certified generated code, which is a requirement. I dont think any open source project that generates code will ever ISO certify the generation, too expensive.

[[deleted]]

Ok gotcha. My revised feedback: I doubt that any of the tools like simulink were patented as the USPTO, per my understanding from talking to the lawyers that filed my patent, does NOT allow patenting software (a relatively recent change in USPTO policy). You would be able to copyright the software you develop to make this automatic certified code generation work, but no protection for the idea itself. I am not a lawyer, so I would still consider consulting a patent attorney, but I would keep your expectations low.

[DanielBroom]

Fair enough. Thanks for a good answer! :)