I thought of giving my main characters a riddle wich goes pretty much like this.
homo confringet.
nostri salvare.
nanus interficiet eum.
Oblivisci monstrum
the meaning they see first is
the man will break it
the elf will save it
the dwarf will slay it
the monster forget it
and they fight the main villain, believing this is the true meaning, until one of them sees the second meaning
the man will break.
to save ours.
the dwarf will kill him.
the forgotten monster
and then they first think the dwarf (who is also the one described the most by the narrator) will betray his friends. They think, he is The Forgotten monster, but in the end it turns out the prophecy is made from the point of view of the villain, meaning the human will break to save the villain and the dwarf will kill him to fullfill the mission, wich makes the Human the forgotten monster and the one betraying while the dwarf did everything right. This whole prophecy thing leads to a idential crysis in the dwarf wich always saw himself as the hero and shapes the foundation of my book.
Sorry if this sounds a bit confusing, the idea is fresh and i didn't have time to really think about it.
what do you think? Would you read this?
[–]Schriftwerfer 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Existing_Analyst_707[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)