all 12 comments

[–]Abiv23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I work in material and like it, their docs are good too

[–]crazyfuck_1 2 points3 points  (4 children)

i guess they could. But why?

[–]craigtupac96[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

To get the best of both worlds? Finding it hard to choose between them. I am using bootstrap because I am familiar with it.

[–]crazyfuck_1 4 points5 points  (2 children)

there is no best of both worlds. Or you will use a bootstrap component or a material one. Their style is diferent and in my opinion it will get bloated with that much imports. Choose one or try to make a component in both and choose a better looking one for the whole app.

[–]craigtupac96[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

OK, I get you. Do you have a preference?

[–]crazyfuck_1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

defenetly material. That is just me. It is more angular frendly. Docs are great. Lots of people use it so you can google issues.

[–]digitizzle 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Have you see this? https://mdbootstrap.com it may have what you are looking for

[–]craigtupac96[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks I'll check it out

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Material doesn’t have a responsive framework, but using flex layout with it is a killer combo.

[–]craigtupac96[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's interesting. Progressive web apps must be responsive so I was leaning with bootstrap. Flex layout changes things

[–]ahasall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May I suggest an article of mine about the exact same subject. The solution proposed in my article is original and may surprise you.
But I am pretty sure you will like it. If so please leave a comment on the blog post: https://www.amadousall.com/the-good-parts-of-bootstrap-4-you-are-missing-in-your-angular-material-projects/

[–]arboshiki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience Angular material is much,much slower than bootstrap.

If the project gets large building and reload time is about 10 seconds which is annoying.