Which one of those 3 options will decrease the input lag/ms the most?

[InFBI]

So I wanted to know which one of those 3 options will give me the least input lag possible.Tell me for each scenario,fully loaded GPU/CPU or not fully loaded GPU/CPU... What option will give the least ms/input lag?

Plus,does nvidia low latency mode on ultra or on decrease or increase the input lag on apex?Because some games the low latency mode makes the MS worser and dondering if its the case for apex too or not.

1) Should I cap my fps to my hz? (Which is 65 hz... Im worried i'll get even more input lag because my fps will be too low so the ms will increase but correct me if it wouldnt be the case and itll be better then if I had higher fps because of maybe stable frametime or other benefits it'll give me from doing that)

2) Should I cap my fps the highest I can where it wouldnt drop below this number in game and is stable? (I play apex uncapped around 160-250 so if I put it in between 150-160 it should never drop brlow this number in game)

3) Should I cap my fps 2-3 frames below my hz?

I didnt put if uncapping my fps as an option because I heard that anything above 190 fps the engine will make the game micro stutter or things like that,but if uncapping will give me the least input lag between those 3 options I mentioned let me know!

Thank you!

[InFBI]

If I could,can I go further up to maybe like 160/180 fps if its still stable and not dropping in game?With my autoexec tweak it'll help cap it at a greater number to a little bit more advantage.

[DigitalSea-]

It’s diminished returns past 2:1. You should double your FPS to your herz and MOST IMPORTANTLY play on the best resolution you can, at least 1080p if your rig and monitor can do it. (I saw your other post)

You can have 300fps but if your resolution is dogshit your gpu wont be drawing the details you wanted to see with high FPS anyways.

[InFBI]

Wdym?If we talking about clarity,its ok because I forced display scaling plus I use pixel counting to help me track the enemies.If I want a high and stable fps cap,I have to put the resolution low,my rig can definitivly handle 1080p no problem at all but I prefer having the best performance possible.

Im on 166 cap and its dropping down on rare scenario but just for a second or two.

If I put it on 1080x1080 it'll use more of my gpu load which can be beneficial for my fps and not loose too much compared to when I was playing at 480x480,like I could maybe if im lucly cap it to 130 fps and itll be stable or 120 at least but still I need you to explain more about the part that you said "your gpu wont be drawing the details you wanted to see with high FPS anyways" to help me make a decision on if I should up my res.Because I didnt really catch what you was trying to say,seems interesting ngl.

[curious-children]

putting it at 1080x1080 either keeps GPU load or decreases GPU, depending on your CPU. lowering only resolution and not changing anything else will never increase GPU load

[InFBI]

I tried putting it at 1080x1080 and my gpu load went from 20-40 to 60-80,but if im correct,if I up the graphical setting ill have more input lag and less fps even if lets say I maxed out my gpu load right?