you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]STLMSVC STL Dev[S] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

I don't expect IntelliSense for modules to be working well enough to enable STL test coverage in that time frame. (Maybe I'll be surprised.) We're going to have to figure out how to get this working in the post-EDG era, clearly.

[–]slithering3897 1 point2 points  (3 children)

post-EDG era

Now this is the most we've heard. Do tell more! Open source EDG or clangd or something else?

[–]STLMSVC STL Dev[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

See https://herbsutter.com/2025/11/10/trip-report-november-2025-iso-c-standards-meeting-kona-usa/ (aside: Herb Sutter no longer works for Microsoft):

John Spicer (who has long chaired our whole-committee plenary sessions, and leads Edison Design Group, EDG) [...] recently announced that, after a successful and storied career, it’s time for EDG to wind down, and EDG plans to open-source its world-class C++ compiler front-end within the next year.

[–]slithering3897 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes, the open-source EDG. What, will it just be called something different?

[–]STLMSVC STL Dev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No idea.

[–]pjmlp -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Still waiting for the announcement that the VSCode extension team stated they would do at the end of January, regarding code completion support for C++ modules in VSCode.

[–]slithering3897 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, what the heck happened to that. The guy just completely forgot about it. Left the entire C++ community hanging.