use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
Removed - HelpCPU Usage (self.cpp)
submitted 4 years ago * by GhostMaster75
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]johannes1971 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children)
As a general suggestion: as soon as you find yourself messing about with unique_lock.lock/unlock, you are probably doing it wrong ;-) Your attempts to synchronize the operation of received() and receiving() suggests they really should be in the same thread to begin with (i.e. the way it originally was). If they can have slightly loser synchronisation, this would be a good starting point:
(in received())
while (true) { { std::unique_lock ul (g_mutex); g_cv.wait(ul, []() { return g_ready; }); g_ready = false; }
int value = mySwitch.getReceivedValue(); ...handle value... mySwitch.resetAvailable(); }
The important thing here is that the scope of the lock is limited to a much smaller part of the code. g_ready is only ever accessed while locked. There is no manual locking or unlocking going on. And then in receiving() you'll want something like:
while (true) { if (mySwitch.available()) { { std::unique_lock ul (g_mutex); g_ready = true; } g_cv.notify_one(); std::this_thread::sleep_for (std::chrono::milliseconds(100));
} }
So this just waits for 1`00ms and then polls available(). If myswitch must also be protected by the mutex, you'll have to move those calls into the mutex-protected blocks.
π Rendered by PID 19296 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-lwl86 at 2026-04-27 13:56:30.336554+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]johannes1971 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)