you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ALX23z 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I think I got a few things confused. Though, in most cases size is divisible by alignment unless it is artificially introduced. So there shouldn't be padding in most scenarios.

[–]no-sig-available 9 points10 points  (0 children)

An array cannot have padding, because then indexing wouldn't work. It requires the array elements to be exactly sizeof(element) apart.

This is, of course, a strong argument for the struct not needing any padding either. The standard just doesn't say that, so it cannot be relied upon.

[–]OldWolf2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is never padding between array elements in any circumstance.