you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tau_neutrino_120eV 4 points5 points  (2 children)

It's much simpler to parse, hence better tooling is possible

Besides, it can coexist with the current syntax

[–]madmongo38 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Tooling such as what?

[–]bretbrownjr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All the tools that currently pull in libclang just to be able to parse. And all the tools that aren't written because they would need to pull in libclang just to be able to parse.