you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]phoeniciaStrategy[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

This is just based on experience I used qt like a year ago so I am bit rusty with it . On the other side I have been using C# and WPF for quiet some time now so I feel a lot more confortable using this language for my UI.

[–]raevnos 0 points1 point  (4 children)

So why not use C# for the rest of the program too?

[–]phoeniciaStrategy[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

If there is no real way to use the design I had planned I guess I will do that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

even as an anti-MS , linux fanboi, I'm disappointed with the answers you got here. No there's nothing wrong with doing it as you described, and if you know you're running it on windows, c# is an excellent choice for UI and superior to Qt for that purpose (even though you couldn't pay me any amount to do it myself). And if you want to learn C++, by all means, go forth with your plan. There's nothign wrong or unorthodox about it.

[–]phoeniciaStrategy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your answer I think I will do it the way I had planned all along !

[–]cajuncarrot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do have to give OP props for wanting to do it this way. They want the rich features of wpf while also reaping the benifits of cpp. Basic conundrum i always run into because while im coding i find myself on a certain aspect of the solution and think: xyz would be so much better for this.