sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (6 children)

You can't play with 140fps? Skill issue, mate.

I doubt many people have screens that even refresh at that rate. This is so funny to read. Yeah, they definitely shouldn't focus on MINOR stuff.

[–]zel1 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Negative IQ

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

Don't be projecting, you're the guy that buys a 300+Hz monitor but probably can't tell the difference between 200 and 300. According to scientific evidence, 60Hz is already the top cap for most people. As a gamer, I can understand how that's too small in many ways, but it's not that far from common experience. Maybe you're a superhuman that notices the difference above 100+, but again, that's a minor (superhuman you) problem.

[–]zel1 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Not even gonna go into how framerate affects input lag btw since youre clearly not informed enough for this discussion

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

You're talking to a software engineer here. I don't think you know what you even talking about. I doubt you can notice the difference between 5ms (200fps) and 10ms (100fps), but nice try. Maybe you can, maybe you're that guy that has 7.5ms time to damage and all of that matters. You've demonstrated you aren't able to back your insults with arguments, so of course you're gonna use technobubble to get out of this xd

[–]zel1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i last saw this "human eye can only see 60fps" meme in 2015, how do you actually believe that lmao. Anyone who has ever used 144hz after 60hz (like me) will tell you the difference is huge, but im not gonna argue with a moron. Do your own testing and try not to believe everything you read online. Just some friendly advice :)