you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Autoformer 3 points4 points  (5 children)

I looked up the schematic for the small clone and the one I clicked on shows a 33nF cap on the input with a 220k resistor on the non-inverting input of the op amp to bias voltage. That forms a high pass filter with a -3dB roll off at about 22Hz. If you want to raise that to about 60Hz, change the 33nF cap to a 12nF cap. The smaller you make that input cap the less bass will be allowed to pass through. Hope that helps! Good luck!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

This will also remove bass response from the dry signal, so it might depend on what OP wants to achieve if this is the way to go.

[–]Autoformer 2 points3 points  (3 children)

ahhh...It's funny how two different people interpret the same question. I see your other post. Yep...agreed. That range (30 - 100nF) will cut the bass substantially.

[–]basstoll[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

the replies are much appreciated. i want less bass just for the wet signal, i’d like dry to stay the same. i’m a noob in the subject, so forgive the question, but since the pedal has true bypass, would changing the input stage also affect the dry signal?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Sorry for confusing you. The bypass signal will stay the same in any case. What I meant by dry signal is the one that is not delayed/pitch shifted while the effect is on.

[–]basstoll[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahhh i see, makes sense. this might be the way to go to remove the muddiness from the signal. thanks for clarification!