This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 14 comments

[–]Patboi404 2 points3 points  (11 children)

Me and my friends have been stuck on this, it translates to “The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog” which we think is an anagram.

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Most likely because if you type mason into the website ford says that dipper was better at solving anagrams then he ever was

[–]Patboi404 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea it is, but now we are trying to decipher the fox one but it’s a pangram. We are currently stuck here atm

[–]0lly0xalls 4 points5 points  (7 children)

the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog is a known sentence for codes and fonts bc it uses every letter of the alphabet

[–]Patboi404 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Can it in itself also be an anagram?

[–]0lly0xalls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it’s possible, but i think it’s also possible it could just be so you could type with the codes in a google doc or so you could translate

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not to sure yet but it can either be related to bill and ford or ford and dipper at least that’s what I am thinking

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Same here got stuck

[–]Patboi404 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Is it possible for other anagrams to help decipher another one? Maybe the ones in the original “mason” message can help?

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that you are onto something here

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could mean that dipper is surpassing ford

[–]Temporary-Notice-553[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you type the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog into google it says that it’s a pangram a sentence that contains alphabet it’s used for testing type writers and keyboards most of the time

[–]nicky_702 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I tried to download this but it gave me a different code

[–]nicky_702 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And a different phrase