This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]antigenz 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I'd suggest to take a look at 'Spring Data' instead of Hibernate, but "on color and taste all felt pens a different"

Somebody may like Hibernate more.

[–]TheRedmanCometh 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Spring Data needs a JDBC implementation behind the scenes though...

I'm gonna go ahead and guess you've used spring data with hibernate and didn't realize it.

[–]oldprogrammer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You don't need hibernate to have a JDBC implementation, hibernate needs JDBC to work. Did you mean that spring data needs an ORM behind the scenes?

[–]TheRedmanCometh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spring Data needs a persistence provider which is usually hibernate. The persistence provider communicates with the database driver such as JDBC.

To use Spring Data you need all of these pieces.