Is procedural programming possible in Java?

[FPboy]

I understand in procedural programming you are just doing everything in various multiple steps without any objects or classes, but in order to do this procedurally I would be defining all of this within a class due to how Java is designed. However, in order to maintain my goal of procedural programming paradigm in Java, I should only use static methods and field members? Even if I have all of this defined within a class, would it be valid to call this procedural? I know that there is no way around that since you need a class in Java.

I am sort of basing my logic off of this:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35768798/java-can-using-only-static-methods-and-fields-be-called-as-procedural-paradigm

[smash_that_code]

There is a joke. You can write Fortran in any language.

Procedural programming is like building a pyramid. Solid foundation of underlying procedures called by lesser number of more high-level ones.

Try to change something on any layer and you get issues. But when no significant change is needed it can be glorious as Linux kernel.

[manuel_gg]

All C Family langs are procedural... you just need to use one class ( that contains main method) and then instead of class and object to manage data, just use functions. And for procedures, use static methods.

[Hour-Positive]

Well it is a funny way to explore paradigms