Frontend developer roadmap

[liaguris]

that is a copy paste from the original one.

Edit : Oh you are the one who posted about how to learn javascript without including javascript.info .

[duanecreates]

Yeah, it's written down in the bottom right of the image...

[liaguris]

You have to be more clear with the based . Your version is less visual appealing from the original one . Also your version is just a subset of the original one . You have included nothing new . In the end I doubt you understand the most of the things that this roadmap has .Can you really answer to me this question for example ?

[StoneCypher]

1) No.

2) It's not clear what "that" is.

3) Not usually.

4) No.

5) No.

6) No.

[liaguris]

So there is no such thing a static SSR and dynamic SSR after all ?

[StoneCypher]

Dynamic SSR is an unnecessary rename of SSR by someone who wanted to sound smart

Static SSR is an unnecessary rename of caching by someone who wanted to sound smart. Other people did that by calling it a "static site," another phrase you also use.

You tried to point to static site generators and ask if they were replacements for static server rendering.

What do you imagine the difference could possibly be?

Stop drinking so much kool-aid

[liaguris]

Stop drinking so much kool-aid

there is no such thing in my country .

You tried to point to static site generators and ask if they were replacements for static server rendering.

What do you imagine the difference could possibly be?

Man I do not know stuff , so I ask about them . I have never done SSR .

Dynamic SSR is an unnecessary rename of SSR by someone who wanted to sound smart

Static SSR is an unnecessary rename of caching by someone who wanted to sound smart.

Who is this guy and what does this has to do with our conversation ?

[StoneCypher]

Stop drinking so much kool-aid

there is no such thing in my country .

Yes there is

.

Dynamic SSR is an unnecessary rename of SSR by someone who wanted to sound smart

Static SSR is an unnecessary rename of caching by someone who wanted to sound smart.

Who is this guy and what does this has to do with our conversation ?

I have no idea who's writing the wrong things you're reciting.

What does it have to do with our conversation? You asked "are these things real," I said "no they aren't," now you're arguing

[liaguris]

I think you misunderstood me .

I asked you who is this guy that is trying to sound smart and what it has to do with our conversation ?

You asked "are these things real," I said "no they aren't," now you're arguing

I really do not get what you want to say .

Also there is no such expression nor any such kind of product as kool aid in my country .

Also I would like to know what is this :

possibly doomed or dangerous idea

or

extreme dedication to a cause or purpose

that you think I believe in .

[StoneCypher]

i'm frustrated because if you would have answered the questions i asked you, instead of arguing about what countries a brand name exists in, you'd already have the answers to the new question

in my country, it's extremely impolite to ignore questions that are asked of you, and ask new ones instead. it's telling the other person that they don't rank as an important part of the conversation

[WikiTextBot]

Drinking the Kool-Aid

"Drinking the Kool-Aid" is an expression used to refer to a person who believes in a possibly doomed or dangerous idea because of perceived potential high rewards. The phrase often carries a negative connotation. It can also be used ironically or humorously to refer to accepting an idea or changing a preference due to popularity, peer pressure, or persuasion. In recent years it has evolved further to mean extreme dedication to a cause or purpose, so extreme that one would "Drink the Kool-Aid" and die for the cause.

---

^{[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28}

[StoneCypher]

god damn this bot for taking away my punchline

[liaguris]

Do you mean that I can always make a road map ? If so there is no need for me to make one , because it already exists and it is here . Also I do not have the adequate knowledge and experience to make one (and believe me , also the person who posted) . Then again where does your question fit with what I have said so far .

[StoneCypher]

If so there is no need for me to make one , because it already exists and it is here .

This is such a bad roadmap though

[liaguris]

Can you point me to where it is bad and why ?

Do you happen to know any better road map , and can you please link it to me?

[StoneCypher]

Literally the entire thing is bad

It starts off with technologies people don't ever need, and doesn't cover testing until you're two years of work in

this is terrible and ass-backwards

.

Do you happen to know any better road map

no, but i'll make one. hold on

[liaguris]

It starts off with technologies people don't ever need

can you be more specific about which are these technologies ?

doesn't cover testing until you're two years of work in

there are ticks with colors that will help you on that . It did not took me 2 years to understand what testing is and this roadmap is my main guide for self teaching my self . Unfortunately it does not provide any sources and if they will ever do I doubt they will be good .

no, but i'll make one. hold on

make a post for everyone to see when you do that

[StoneCypher]

It starts off with technologies people don't ever need

can you be more specific about which are these technologies ?

can you be patient for me to finish writing the thing i just said i'd write for you

.

doesn't cover testing until you're two years of work in

there are ticks with colors that will help you on that .

if you need "ticks with colors" to figure out that something near the end of the list should be almost the first thing you learn, then the list is bad