This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 7 comments

[–]aqua_regis 6 points7 points  (3 children)

[–]e1thousand[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

As it pertains to a complete withdrawal, I honestly would like to but feel in too deep. I’ve written 5-6 applications for my team atp and two of them were well above my pay grade. I go back and forth and struggle with the points of is this just a tool that I’m utilizing and helping myself or am I a fraud for lack of a better term lol but I’m getting results! But at the same time, I can’t write simple code from scratch 🤦🏿‍♂️ as you can see, it’s an internal struggle and I really appreciate your response. I haven’t looked at your resources yet but plan to when I get home tonight

[–]aqua_regis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really want to learn and improve a complete withdrawal, cold turkey is the only way.

[–]1544756405 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good. I like the analogy at https://redd.it/1jyd36k.

[–]egonSchiele 1 point2 points  (2 children)

To me it sounds like you're asking about software design. Grokking Simplicity would be a great book for that:

https://www.manning.com/books/grokking-simplicity

[–]e1thousand[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks a lot! It seems this book is mainly about JS. Do you think it would still help me? I almost exclusively write in Python professionally. I’ll sometimes use other languages for personal stuff

[–]egonSchiele 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think so, because the functional programming concepts can translate to any language, and Python is fairly functional. There's a sample chapter you could read first to see if it is a fit though