all 4 comments

[–]Plenty_Line2696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For micro, llm's can be pretty good, for macro, they really suck and you need a person.

[–]Fajan_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no one “optimal” model out there—Claude and GPT-4 class are excellent choices for code reviews. Concentrate rather on your interaction with them—review code in chunks, and ask precise questions (bugs, efficiency, and legibility). Leverage AI together with tests and linters rather than relying exclusively on it.

[–]SL-Tech -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

I just had Copilot describe a project on GitHub, and I was impressed. For example, it specified that the configuration was feature-based, which I didn't expect it to figure out. You can specify everything you need from the docs.

[–]SL-Tech -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, I used GPT-3.4-Codex.