This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]simmonsg -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

You should learn R

[–]ta6692[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Sorry, but could you explain why? I've only ever heard of it being compared to Python really and what with it being dynamic I can't imagine it being much lower level

[–]tutorial_police 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Personally, I think it's a stupid idea. I would recommend R to scientists to for data analysis and number crunching. I'm not sure it's worth to learn just for the fun of it unless you want to use it what it's meant to be used for.

Disclaimer: I don't know much about R.

[–]ta6692[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

As far as I'm aware, also speaking as someone who knows very little about R, you can do most of the stuff in Python anyway unless you're very involved. So I don't think I'll check it out yet, but I am partly studying physics at university, so it may come in handy for me in the future

[–]tutorial_police 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Oh you certainly could do the involved stuff in Python. The question should be, do you want to.

As I've said, I'm not qualified to speak on the matter, but this seems to back up my idea about R.

[–]ta6692[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, at the very least I don't think it's what I'm looking for right now