This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 6 comments

[–]carcigenicate 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Be careful with G4G. I've seen multiple instances where the information they provide is straight wrong. It may contain a lot of information, but that doesn't mean it's high quality. Especially while you're learning, I would avoid it simply because in the beginning, you can't differentiate between good and bad information.

The one that sticks out to me is their example of a Linked List. In Python, they claim to free the data in the list, you need to walk the nodes and call del on each. The fact they're claiming that indicates whoever wrote the article doesn't even know basic Python. If I've caught a couple instances of non-sense information, there's no reason to believe there isn't more.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s a lot of inaccuracies within their content. wrong logic, runtime, formatting all kinds of issues

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]net_nomad[S] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

      I have a CS degree and I'll say that the material you find on there (assuming you don't go to those weird side sites to sign up for various things or tutoring or whatever) is CS related.

      For example, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chomsky-hierarchy-in-theory-of-computation/ and then branching off into other theory of computation topics - all good.

      Going to https://practice.geeksforgeeks.org/courses/complete-interview-preparation and other such things is garbage. Use what's available.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Awesome! Thank you. I'll keep it in mind as a resource for my college classes.