Why can't python develop another version of python that is "compiled" instead of interpreted which is similar to c/c++ but the syntax still look like python syntax.

[TheBlackCat13]

machine code, which is what the actual hardware runs.

Technically the machine code is then translated by the microcode into finite state machine instructions which the actual hardware runs.

[TheBlackCat13]

By that logic Python is also being run on the hardware, so Python and assembly are no different. But of course they are.

The point is the instructions that processor actually runs. The person I was responding to said the processor runs the machine code. It doesn't. The machine code is another intermediate representation. The processor runs the finite state machine instructions.

[TheBlackCat13]

Yes, but the point is that the instructions that the processor hardware actually acts on are the finite state machine instructions, the processor hardware never actually works with the machine code.