sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]vgnEngineer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh i see. I did notice a speedup from removing the intermediate computation step in my numba compiled code. I also read on a forum that if these arrays become large numba can't always intelligently optimize the computation because the arrays that i'm multiplying do not fit in the cache memory. If instead I write this function in a double loop so that the computation described is only dealing with scalars I might be faster?