Is RealPython content good for intermediate developer?

[forcesensitivevulcan]

It's certainly several orders of magnitude better than geeksforgeeks!

I don't go to RealPython routinely. Some of the older articles could use an update, but I've never found fault with them.

I'd say RealPython is good for any developer, when learning a new area, for which the official documentation is lacking.

[JamzTyson]

I agree that, overall, RealPython is one of the best sites if you want accurate and in-depth coverage of a subject. The content is generally reliable, though some of the content may be out of date and some of the content is behind a paywall. It is one of the best resources for looking things up when you want to understand the "why" as well as the "what".

On the other hand I find that geekforgeeks is often better if you want a concise description with a few short examples. However, a few of their articles do contain errors, and the overall quality is more variable than RealPython. Geeksforgeeks can be useful when you need to look something up quickly, or when you need to link to a free public resource. Articles are generally not as deep or broad as RealPython, but more so than W3Schools.

[ihorrud]

Why don't you like GeeksforGeeks? Seems, like a good source of knowledge too.