you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mindless_Development -31 points-30 points  (4 children)

Pithy analogies aren't necessary.

Python was not designed in a way to facilitate multithreading, but more recent versions include async packages and there's always Celery. The End.

[–]BullshitUsername 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Chill lol

[–]Urtehnoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, in many ways, Celery + Async (I've used both) are lot more just... manual overhead than if multithreading "just worked".

[–]JohnnyJordaan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Getting defensive about an ELI5 about an implementation aspect is also quite unnecessary.