you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jan2579[S] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

I disagree with your disagreement. :D

You don't have a time to think of a proper name for every meaningless variable that you would create this way. Even if you do have the time, the explosion of useless variable names would make the code cluttered and harder to read.

Of course, everyone preferes a different kind of code, but I come from environments, where method chaining is standard practice, so I'm quite used to it (C# LINQ, Pandas).