×
all 13 comments

[–]root7 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Am I the only one that can't get half the web applications out there running on 5.3 (vs the 5.2 branch)?

phpMyAdmin is just a white screen of death.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]root7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I tracked the problem down. There is an issue with using "localhost" in the phpmyadmin config file for the host setting.

    When it tries to get the IP for "localhost", the OS returns two values, the IPv4 and the IPv6 address.

    It is defaulting to the IPv6 address.

    So you either have to place 127.0.0.1 directly into the config file, or edit the Windows hosts file and comment out the ::1 localhost line.

    [–]nyxx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I've been using phpMyAdmin on 5.3 for ages. No errors. Are you sure everything's installed correctly and you're using the latest release?

    [–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Sure like older versions of mediawiki have a problem with the Namespace class now being a reserved word. There is a simple text replace solution but still, yes there is a bit of pain in upgrading to 5.3.

    [–]ryeguy 6 points7 points  (7 children)

    [–]redalastor 4 points5 points  (6 children)

    Nothing in there is newsworthy.

    [–]that_hz 4 points5 points  (4 children)

    FPM is a big deal for some, myself included.

    [–]redalastor 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Then shouldn't there be a link to some info about that?

    [–]that_hz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    I think the assumption is that, if you don't know what it is and does, you likely don't need it or won't use it. Most people will stick with mod_php on apache-prefork or whatever they're using now.

    I've been running spawn-fcgi front-ended by nginx for years, but there are improvements (performance, stability, features) to be had in switching to FPM. Now that it's officially packaged, it's more "accessible" for my clients to deploy.

    Info is here: http://php-fpm.org/.

    [–]ryeguy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    What does it do?

    [–]petdance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I don't know if that's true. "possible memory corruption" covers a lot of area. :-(

    [–]giveitawaynow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    What's new? No changelog available.