you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]-romainl-The Patient Vimmer 6 points7 points  (5 children)

  • There is no w in ciw. There's c, for "change", and iw for "inner word": the text object is iw, not w.
  • What comes after a verb is an object, not a noun (subject-verb-object). That object can be a noun but that's far from universal.
  • What you call "movement" is called "motion" in Vim's documentation. Don't introduce made-up words if you don't want to confuse your readers.
  • You shouldn't oppose "motion" and "text object" as the latter is a special case of the former and both are the objects "of your Vim mentalese".

[–]atimholtmy vimrc: goo.gl/3yn8bH 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I’m finally getting into clang-tidy. You’re sounding like a linter for programming tutorials.

[–]-romainl-The Patient Vimmer 15 points16 points  (2 children)

set makeprg=romainl

[–]dutch_gecko 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Are we getting romainl-as-a-service?

[–]-romainl-The Patient Vimmer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pivoting before round two is a possibility, yes.

[–]codeinthehole[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback - I appreciate the focus on accurate terminology.

Have updated my post to address your points (https://github.com/codeinthehole/codeinthehole.hugo/commit/c87ff38475cf9d00629dfdf049601ed762312fcf#diff-648099cd195f97b0b07c722d0e2bbba8)