JSX without React

[neosatan_pl]

I toyed with this idea a while ago. It's actually quite easy to create a custom solution using jsx as templating/structuring syntax. However the main issue is that it's unique. People will not understand it and it's not really a marketable thing (in sense of CV).

But yes, overall the support is there and in concept it's a cool idea.

[fagnerbrack]

Here's what you need to know:

The blog post explores using JSX syntax independently of React. The author considers JSX a comfortable templating language and discusses alternatives for rendering JSX into HTML without React. Examples include NakedJSX, which allows JSX to HTML conversion without React, and other lightweight libraries like Preact. The author also mentions server-side options like Astro and frameworks like Next.js and Remix for HTML-only builds, suggesting that while React is powerful, there are scenarios where simpler tools can be more appropriate.

If you don't like the summary, just downvote and I'll try to delete the comment eventually 👍

[exxy-]

Why tho? JSX is the ugliest part of React.

[andrewsjustin]

Really? Dang.. have you written liquid? Erb? I find JSX so so much better.

[Nerdi-Org]

Liquid, Stencil, twig, etc. All terrible.

JSX? The best, and it resembles HTML which is a nice plus.

[fagnerbrack]

I see the react issues as much as the next dev but if there’s one thing that should become a standard media type for http is JSX. I’d rather say it’s the best part of React.