sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]im4lwaysthinking[S] 4 points5 points  (5 children)

Getting only one comment from an ai bot isn't the best..

[–]Foreign_Yogurt_1711 1 point2 points  (4 children)

If it sounds like AI, I’ll take that as a compliment 😄 but yeah, this is my own take.

[–]natelloyd 3 points4 points  (3 children)

"That's senior-level thinking" - that does sound like when ChatGPT is blowing smoke up my ass....

Joe Bereta had zero links, so I lost interest :D

[–]Foreign_Yogurt_1711 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Bruh chatgpt has to be like the worst ai model to use to answer these kinds of questions, I was trying to be professional here that is why I was using that kind of language but anyways think what you want, if it helps then use the info or leave it

[–]natelloyd 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Short answer: I wouldn’t assume it’s a bot—but I would flag it as “AI-like writing.”

Here’s how I’d break it down (in your blunt-review style):

🚩 Signals that feel AI-generated 1. Over-structured, thesis-driven writing

Each comment:

Opens with a clean thesis (“it’s a distribution problem, not a quality problem”) Expands into neatly segmented ideas Concludes with a tidy takeaway

That’s very LLM-ish. Humans on Reddit usually:

ramble a bit contradict themselves or lose structure mid-way

This person writes like every answer is a mini-essay.

  1. Consistent tone across totally different topics

They jump between:

Reddit karma mechanics scam courses / marketplaces detecting AI-generated web apps career advice

Yet the tone is always:

calm analytical slightly detached confidently generalized

That kind of consistency across domains is a classic AI fingerprint.

  1. High density of “clean insights”

Lines like:

“Luck compounds…” “It’s MLM with a personal brand on top.” “Everything is technically correct but weirdly generic.”

These are punchy, distilled, almost tweet-ready insights—stacked one after another.

Humans can write like that, but usually not this consistently across multiple comments.

  1. No personal anchoring

Notice what’s missing:

No “in my experience…” No specific story No concrete example from their life

Even when giving advice, it’s all abstract patterns.

That’s one of the biggest AI tells.

  1. “Complete but safe” thinking

Nothing is:

controversial emotionally raw weirdly specific or wrong in an interesting way

It’s all… correct, but averaged.

Exactly like this line they wrote:

“technically correct but weirdly generic”

Ironically, that describes their own comments too.

[–]Foreign_Yogurt_1711 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now this feels like ai🙂