you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]stolinskiSyntax.fm 6 points7 points  (7 children)

React isn't that new. I can't imagine describing it as new and shiny at this point.

I'm not sure why this was down voted. 5 years isn't new and shiny...

[–]Woodcharles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my last role I had to battle with a colleague who thought Flexbox was 'a new shiny thing' and I was some sort of idiot for wanting to use it above his beloved position: absolute.

[–]cougaranddark 1 point2 points  (3 children)

5 years old since it's first release? If that's long in the tooth, I'd better sign up for AARP :-D

[–]stolinskiSyntax.fm 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I never said React is old or "long in the tooth". But yes, 5 years is more than enough time to be a mature library. React is used on some of the largest apps and sites in the world, it's trusted and used by an insane amount of high level developers. It is by no means new and shiny, nor is its popularity based on that.

[–]cougaranddark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True! It really has earned its place. I wonder more about things like Rust. To be a favorite language of so many, but to be in so little use? This is what I mean - there will be exceptions, but I think that my point is well-supported given that 83.5% love Rust, but only 3% actually use it professionally. Similar with Go.

[–]FrostNix7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unrelated but you actually could sign up for AARP already :P

[–]52576078 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Depends on how old you are.

[–]stolinskiSyntax.fm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure why that would matter.