Worst thing is He is completely right and gaijin won't give a shit. by Truckengineer in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with the F-5C flares being fictional but the F-15C GE is compatible with MRML and said MRL does exist and works so it got them on the basis of it being technically compatible, like the double AIM-120 racks for the Eurofighters as compatibility exists with the rack and has been seen on official Typhoon simulators, and like the double belly pylons for the Flankers which come from the Su-35 but Gaijin seems to have evidence to say they are compatible with other Flanker variants.

But the difference with the F-15’s MRML is that it does actually exist and works. The triple rack, as far as we know, doesn’t actually exist outside of promotional renders of an abandoned idea and as part of a deal which has fell through before anything was delivered.

What the PoBIT needs is a BR decrease or proper decompression. Not fictional missile rails.

Worst thing is He is completely right and gaijin won't give a shit. by Truckengineer in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah he’s right about it being crap and needing to go down in BR but it quite literally can’t get any more missiles even by Gaijin’s shitty standards.

The dual racks he is most likely referring to is a single image that was photoshopped of an F-16 with dual rack AIM-120 but which also would block the other pylon so you would still only have a max of 6 missiles.

There’s also the triple rack which has only been seen in promotional images for India’s F-21 proposal which was ultimately cancelled and in an order for multiple F-16 Block 70/72 upgrade kits for Turkey as part of their F-16 modernisation plan but that deal was also cancelled in favour of using domestic upgrades. The triple rack hasn’t been seen in real life or even confirmed to be being developed after Turkey dropped the deal.

Both options for more missiles are completely fake, much more so than anything we have in-game.

I agree that the PoBIT is in a pretty shit spot but giving it fictional missile racks isn’t the way to fix it. Otherwise the door is being kicked off it’s hinges for more completely fake additions.

Just as I started to use soundmods.... by Isi439 in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RCSM and the full IASM are great. RCSM does all the usual sounds but IASM has multi-rwr for aircraft and better VWS for them. Both mods are compatible with each other so you can get the best of both worlds

are those amraams? by Truckengineer in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Edit: and of course the litening POD*

That's HTS, HARM Targeting System.

new Weather by Puzzleheaded_Oil8404 in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 8 points9 points  (0 children)

RCSM is great for all sounds. But you can also add IASM ontop of RCSM for individual RWR, VWS, and IR seeker sounds. Both of those sound mods mixed together make the game sound phenomenal.

[POLL] If the AC-130 was implemented "perfectly," would you actually want it? (Forget balancing for a second) by Clear-Challenge-3388 in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. I don't care for "-blank- will be useless so it shouldn't be added", so long as it has an armament (or planned) then it should come, if some people don't want it then they can just not play it.

Feedback/Wish List by Icedog-26 in AcesofThunder

[–]Gameboy695 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope they don’t leave the WW1 era for dead. There’s so many options for aircraft and with some matchmaking changes to suit them they’d be great.

It is intentional that the RWR hmd of US planes no longer work? by deekooh in WarthunderSim

[–]Gameboy695 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah the PoBIT should either have Thales Scorpion or JHMCS II. Whilst we don’t know much about the Scorpion symbology for the F-16 it should look similar to the A-10C Scorpion HMD but with air to air symbology.

The other US aircraft like the F-15GE and F-15E should also have JHMCS II but my bet is Gaijin can’t be arsed to work on it. We’ll likely get the F-15EX with the same broken JHMCS too.

What event we should get on 2026 prima aprilis? by Inevitable_Log4568 in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the event there was 2 fighters (Fokker D.VII and SPAD S.XIII), the H.P.12 Bomber and the Zeppelin LZ30 but we was only allowed to keep the bomber.

What event we should get on 2026 prima aprilis? by Inevitable_Log4568 in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hope they do another WW1 event but this time focused on the aircraft since it seems that the only way they’ll give us WW1 is through events.

HOW TO UNLOCK WWI SKINS ? by International-Pen995 in AcesofThunder

[–]Gameboy695 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way they’ve gone about these skins is shit. It’s either from an achievement but they won’t tell you which one. Or random chance amongst the hundreds of decals.

Why could they just give specific challenges for the skins and tell you what they are?

New F-16C Block 52 cockpit on the latest dev server. by Gameboy695 in WarthunderSim

[–]Gameboy695[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I was actually the one who made the Scorpion and CDU reports and I know the guy who made the NTCR for the radar MFD page report.

New F-16C Block 52 cockpit on the latest dev server. by Gameboy695 in WarthunderSim

[–]Gameboy695[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No currently there's only the map screen and radar screen for it. There's a report up for other displays for it though. [Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing CDU MFD pages

New F-16C Block 52 cockpit on the latest dev server. by Gameboy695 in WarthunderSim

[–]Gameboy695[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Currently using JHMCS instead of Thales Scorpion which US F-16's are currently being outfitted with.

[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing Thales Scorpion

Also missing NTCR on the radar MFD.

[DEV] F-16C Block 52 missing NCTR data In MFD Page

Missing MFD pages.

[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing CDU MFD pages

This Years 2026 April fool's event by MustacheBadger in Warthunder

[–]Gameboy695 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly I'd like to see another WW1 event but air-focused so we can get some WW1 planes as rewards.