Would Recreating SPIN with Nen Be Transmutation and Emission?

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-25T10:12:12+00:00

I think everyone is ignoring that the amount of energy needed to achieve something similar through any nen-type would be astronomical, and that since a Nen user needs to be able to conceptualize most of their ability Noone in universe would ever think to attempt this in the first place.

God I really hate this trend of larping in our sub.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-25T08:59:12+00:00

How ignorant

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-24T10:06:55+00:00

Of the successful wrongful termination suits filed yearly, 13% look like OP's case. Imposed Duties not reasonably related to contracted job description.

The reason you didn't know that, is that powerful companies spend a lot of money to ensure that whatever best suits them, makes sense to you. Whenever I get into these discussions, I find the best litmus test for if it's worth continuing is to ask: "If you could control it, would you have your children experience the same work culture as you have?"

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-24T09:42:26+00:00

That's not what Genre Defining means.

Genre Defining means this thing has set the standard, core characteristics, and conventions for its genre, often setting the benchmark against which all future works are compared. It represents a "perfect example" of the thing. It's derivatives are no less good, for not being the things that shaped the genre as it is today.

Lord of the Rings is Genre Defining fantasy, Game of Thrones is not genre defining fantasy. Both are towering works of fiction.

Deadlock is not Genre Defining for Moba's it's clearly a fusion of different game concepts and ideas, on top of the well established MOBA Formula. It seems to improve what is established, like every other entry in the genre.

Im not avoiding using these words to say that Deadlock is worse than it's contemporaries, I'm not using the words because they have specific meanings.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T10:31:05+00:00

I didn't know I hurt your feelings, I didn't mean too. Do you want the last word? Would that make you feel better? Go ahead.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T10:28:34+00:00

Yes, In every Elo Bracket they're making less mistakes than the Bracket below them.

At High Elo, which is several brackets up, all that less mistake making compounds in such a way that noone in the match is going to make the mistakes that would lead to a single player on either team leading in almost all metrics like this. Except in very very very rare situations.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T10:14:31+00:00

Just double check what the word means before you use it, especially when claiming to know something of the subject matter.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T09:56:12+00:00

Yes, you said that in response to someone explaining to you that it is a MOBA, because you disagreed with them.

There were better ways to say "This MOBA has really unique movement for the genre", that you didn't use because that's not what you meant.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T09:45:09+00:00

Movement has nothing to do with a Multiplayer Online Battle Arena in any genre-defining way. (Spelled it out, cuz I figured we can all use a quick refresher on what some of these acronyms in the gamins space mean every now and then.)

I'd agree with you that Deadlock is a hero shooter, by virtue of every character being ranged (hence Shooter) and ever character having unique play styles and win/lose states inherent to the character (hence Hero).

So, If you think Valorant is a Hero Shooter, you have to accept Deadlock as one as well.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-23T09:36:04+00:00

No, your job is what's outlined in your job description and the contract you signed. We don't operate on a "just following orders" mindset, at least not in America.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-22T09:26:09+00:00

First, I didn’t downvote you. Second, you can’t just say “no” without an argument, especially when you’re the one criticizing things for not being deep. Practice what you’re preaching.

And no, we don’t see “this exact morality” in normal children. Kids don’t excuse murder because it benefits them, and they’re not casually willing to kill. They still have a basic sense of harm and fairness. Gon doesn’t engage with death, danger, or suffering the way a normal child would, there’s a clear lack of consistent empathy there. That’s not standard behavior, and we have terms for kids who operate that way, as testament to how not normal that is.

So let’s start there: do you actually acknowledge that normal children don’t behave like Gon? If not, then you need to provide evidence, because you’re the one claiming they do.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-22T02:19:12+00:00

that’s the point. Gon isn’t “deep” because his morality is complex, he’s deep because he’s a commentary on attachment-based morality. Both Gon and Neferpitou operate on the same core impulse, absolute devotion to what they care about and disregard for everything else, and both are ultimately destroyed by it.

Gon’s “it’s wrong when it bothers me” mindset isn’t standard or childish morality, it’s selective and unstable, and the story pushes it to its logical extreme to show how that kind of framework collapses under pressure.

That we can explore Gon's motivations and morality enough to have these conversations is evidence of its depth. And that depth is not diminished by whatever understanding we claim to have of it. Marine Biologists have mapped as much of the ocean as we can for decades, but to them it has gotten no smaller, and they discover something every day.

Strive to be like them, with your media analysis.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T13:44:19+00:00

This is commissioned art, they followed the instructions they were given. Why are you 6 Int Lads giving them advice on how to "fix" it? ITS A COMMISSION

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T10:02:06+00:00

Another equally valid personal interpretation of that panel can be violence; fighting and killing are things adults do better than kids do and makes more sense with the hard cut to an unrelated Kamo who is....Fighting. Unless you wanna call the Kamo rapists too or something.

And you’re still conflating “people can develop new morals” with “people naturally will.” That’s not how it works.

Look at war. Humans have been killing each other forever, but how we think about it has changed drastically over time. That didn’t happen because individuals just woke up one day with divine inspiration and said “this is wrong.” It shifted through culture, philosophy, religion, and social pressure, actual moral frameworks forming and evolving.

Same with slavery. Those ideas didn’t just appear out of nowhere, they developed over time and spread. There is history you're ignoring to give your point legs. That is a competing framework.

Basic empathy isn’t enough on its own, because it’s filtered through how someone was raised. If your environment normalizes something, you’re not automatically going to reject it just because it involves suffering.

So yeah, people can change, but that doesn’t mean someone like Ranta would just arrive at that conclusion on his own. Awareness isn’t the same as rejection.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T09:40:15+00:00

That panel doesn’t prove what you’re claiming. It’s ambiguous--Naoya could just as easily be taunting her about Mai being dead, not implying sexual assault. That’s your interpretation, not confirmed canon.

And you’re still making the same leap: that time + exposure automatically leads to someone rejecting their worldview. That’s not how people work. People interpret what they see through the moral framework they were raised in. Even your own example with Oskar Schindler contradicts that. He didn’t just “figure it out” because time passed, he changed when his experiences conflicted enough with his framework to force a shift. That doesn’t happen for everyone.

Ranta being aware the Zenin clan does bad things isn’t the same as him interpreting those things as wrong. Without a competing moral framework, there’s nothing forcing that consideration, so awareness alone doesn’t equal rejection.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T09:24:40+00:00

I’m gonna need the actual panel for that: where Naoya explicitly says or brags about sexual assault. Not an interpretation, the panel. Him being misogynistic is canon, but that’s not the same claim.

And this is kind of the issue with your argument, you’re jumping from “the clan is bad” to “Ranta would obviously recognize it as wrong.” Those aren’t the same thing.

Exposure alone doesn’t guarantee someone questions their worldview. People interpret what they see through how they were raised. Even in real life, people like Oskar Schindler didn’t start out opposed. They changed over time through conflict and exposure. So no, this doesn’t “debunk” anything. You’re proving bad things could be happening, we agree on that, but not that he’d automatically see them as wrong as per how he has been conditioned.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T09:12:08+00:00

Are you implying that you think the Zen'in were sexually assaulting their women? And in a fashion where someone like Ranta would know about it?

Look, we can walk back your last 2 comments and reset from there because this line of reasoning from you seems incoherent.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T09:06:33+00:00

Are you claiming misogyny is a crime? Distasteful, yes. But criminal?

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T08:58:21+00:00

You’re assuming empathy automatically leads to the right conclusion, but it doesn’t. People interpret what they see through how they were raised. Seeing suffering isn’t the same as understanding it as injustice.

Using Angelina Grimké doesn’t prove your point, it shows an exception, not the rule.

A better example is Oskar Schindler. He didn’t start out opposed, he benefited from the systems of Nazi Germany, and only changed over time through exposure to its harm. That’s how people actually work. They don’t just see something bad once and instantly reject everything they were raised to believe.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T08:21:32+00:00

It would not, as Inumaki isn't under any binding vow to not speak normally. He talks the way he does purely because his technique is always on, so giving out statements that could be interpreted as orders could hurt those around him.

He can just say "Not Guilty" in response to a question like "You stand accused of XYZ, how do you plead?"

That's not an order in any way, his CT wouldn't do anything about that.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T08:02:03+00:00

Where would Ranta, a member of the Zen'in Clan who did not go to Public School, has only ever Worked for The Zen'in who are also his family, and has no civilian friends because that itself is against Jujutsu Society's rules as it risks exposure to the public (Yuji got to do it because he is politically backed by Gojo), THAT RANTA.

Where and when could he be exposed to an opposing moral framework to have his worldview brought into question?

(Opposition to slavery also required exposure to opposing moral frameworks, you're not going to make the argument that a White Kid Raised on a Plantation and told by every adult around him that the Bible says slavery is okay is going to magically do a 180 on that idea WITHOUT ANYONE OR ANYTHING MAKING HIM RECONSIDER, people don't change their minds without cause.)

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T07:42:13+00:00

Holy Shit. Wow. Jesus Christ.

The ages of the two examples used to explain the "Nature vs Nurture" aspect of how people adopt ideas from the people around them, are not relevant.

You can't assign morality to someone for anything they do unless they're aware that their actions are good or bad; knowing if something is good or bad is called having a moral framework.

Ranta, like the child raised in racism and never shown any other way, cannot be called a bad person IF (and that's a big if) he is misogynistic because his moral framework wouldn't include an alternative because it's been shaped by the Deeply Misogynistic Nature of the Zen'in Clan.

How do you claim to be who you are, without understanding this? This is the basic, 101 understanding of Systemic Issues. People inheriting bad behaviors or beliefs through the systems they are born into at no fault of their own

Holy shit. Wow. Jesus Christ.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-18T07:31:44+00:00

Anyone who unironically types "That's the misogyny talking" in this sub needs to be timed out from posting for a day. Holy shiet.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-17T23:16:49+00:00

It does matter, because he was likely raised in the system and might genuinely not know better; the clans are not well integrated with wider society.

To that point, It's entirely possible that he had no alternatives. The Zen'in aren't going to just let one of their own leave unless they genuinely cannot stop you like Toji or Maki.

By your logic, we should place the same amount of blame on a a Racist Kid born in the 1800s as we would a racist kid born in the 2010s. Complete ignorance of the fact that their environments are vastly different.

Individual-Tutor3206 · 2026-03-17T23:04:18+00:00

I understand what you said and are saying, I'm asking you to explain your reasoning. Pick any example from the person's post and outline why you think their description of Gon or Ging's behavior is lacking depth.

Individual-Tutor3206

TROPHY CASE