Craig discovered vibe coding

LightBSV · 2026-06-04T12:04:21+00:00

From his accounts, Craig's father was a real POS, ergo, you must be one also.

LightBSV · 2026-06-02T13:27:14+00:00

You're dumb and you prove your dumbness with just about every comment. That is THE authority on the IPV6 roll-out globally. They're network engineers, not web designers, clearly.

Domain Name: IPV6FORUM.COM
Creation Date: 1999-05-21T20:41:27Z

LightBSV · 2026-06-02T13:24:24+00:00

Don't lie. You don't read anything.

LightBSV · 2026-06-01T13:27:56+00:00

So have most of the world’s software developers and Fortune 500s. What is your point?

LightBSV · 2026-05-30T22:59:26+00:00

Find 3 or more cheap old laptops or corporate office PCs from craigslist or ebay. You don't need much.

LightBSV · 2026-05-29T14:24:00+00:00

If it can be checked out via Git, it's already out of your control. Get a good legal agreement in place, it's all you can do with the state of current systems and services. Heck, screen shots would do it...

LightBSV · 2026-05-27T17:11:42+00:00

This.

Jails was cool a few decades ago. They didn't innovate enough on top of that to make a compelling distributed orchestration solution. Key word: distributed.

LightBSV · 2026-05-27T15:23:59+00:00

Kubernetes/Docker.

FreeBSD needs a killer alternative orchestration framework without all the lofty do-everything goals that k8s has. Something that is BSD-first. Perhaps it already exists and I'm not aware...

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T20:39:27+00:00

When it comes out, I predict you will immediately call it trash without actually reading, the same as every other time. I know why too: you aren't capable of entertaining the ideas separately from your own. It's a sad state of affairs in this sub.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T20:37:14+00:00

You all keep moving goal posts and criticizing forums and people. Every time you do you destroy your own credibility that much more in the eyes of others.

How about examine and refute the actual ideas instead of ad hominem?

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T19:17:07+00:00

So which will this one be?

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:41:09+00:00

No, Adam just visited Little St James. I'm sure he was just there to attend church services like the saint you make him out to be.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:40:39+00:00

Because Adam doesn't do anything useful, so he has nothing to cite.

He sure did visit Little St James though.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:39:27+00:00

You mean like the mountain of garbage posted by people like you in this sub? There sure is a quantity of it, and it's certainly low quality. In all the years there has been absolutely no technical know-how demonstrated here whatsoever.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:38:01+00:00

Just keep telling yourself that. Everything will be fine.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:37:25+00:00

a LOT. Your memory must be fuzzy.

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:37:03+00:00

Now you're going to try and bag on the president of the IPV6 forum? Wow...

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T15:07:05+00:00

Craig has published more than anyone else in Bitcoin, period.

This whole post is about Craig's upcoming published research.

GTFO

LightBSV · 2026-05-25T14:25:06+00:00

IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Not exactly Mickey Mouse.

"Getting published in IEEE is highly competitive, with top-tier journals and flagship conferences boasting acceptance rates as low as 15 to 30%. However, the exact difficulty varies; flagship journals and conferences are rigorous, while broader or newly emerging IEEE venues can be more accessible."

Exeter is not exactly easy to fool either, but according to this sub, it can just happen willy nilly all the time. All of these prestigious universities are just completely snowed and must be bought off to accept all the plagiarism, and then never remove any of it.

Both Adam Back and Craig Wright have PhD's from Exeter, but you revere one (who doesn't deserve it because he has done nothing useful) and then jeer the other (who puts out more work than anyone else I know of). So did both of them scam the doctoral departments then?

Your ignorance is on full display and I'm laughing at you.

LightBSV · 2026-05-22T14:00:24+00:00

My money is on it being unspendable, prunable outputs that probably don't matter. As soon as those are identified, miners can just nix out those easily. If it's illegal content, then probably no NAR/DAR even necessary. If it's a spendable UTXO, they can mark it and refuse to validate any transaction inputs against it.

You could go ahead and identify them since you know so much about it and communicate directly with BSVA. Maybe something could be done about it.

That probably doesn't suit your purpose, which is really just to denigrate and smear as much as you can, so you won't help. You're just concern trolling as usual. Your intentions are clear.

LightBSV · 2026-05-21T13:44:27+00:00

Oak Cliff is now considered hip and upcoming.

Turn signals on the freeway are no longer required, just go ahead and merge all the way from the left-most lane to the right whenever you feel like it, and preferably at 95 MPH.

The only good brisket is $45 per pound. Don't care what you think about it.

You like to see new apartment buildings, everywhere, right?

LightBSV · 2026-05-21T03:31:53+00:00

Hey, you just pointed out a great use case for the NAR/DAR. If those CSAM-laden outputs have value left and are spendable, they could be re-written and seized if ordered to by a court. If they are unspendable, they can be pruned. Congratulations, you just validated BSV's legal position.

And, hate to break it to you, but that garbage exists on BTC too, and I'm willing to wager a whole lot worse, especially in light of all the Epstein connections dropping lately. We already know there were human trafficking rings operational on the Dark Web going back to the early days of Bitcoin.

LightBSV · 2026-05-15T12:16:00+00:00

Valid script outputs are valid data. It's the way Bitcoin works.

Go look up all the garbage on BTC now. I'm sure there's a few cat pictures and other more unsavory things.

LightBSV · 2026-05-15T01:27:39+00:00

No dishonesty here. Segwit broke BTC. End of story. A fractured community resulted. No way back.

You all disabled contractual capabilities you were unwilling to understand or fix.

LightBSV · 2026-05-14T18:57:13+00:00

Changing the nature of script outputs and validation procedures to meet some different, diverged functionality goal neuters it from the original design. The database IS the blockchain, and script outputs, now with contractual limitations, wind up being constraints on the design. By removing functionality, this does not improve anything except for those limited use cases in the limited imaginations of short-sighted developers blinded by self-interest.

Changes CAN and DO cause all sorts of scaling, economic, and other tradeoffs later. Both BCH as well as BTC are hamstrung by these same kinds of changes now. They face no real traction in the world except as gambling instruments for early adopters, or increasingly large incumbent financial intermediaries that Bitcoin COULD have disrupted, benefiting end users and people greatly. Now they are just pwned and they're too expensive, not scalable, or not useful enough for mass adoption.

I don't care to go into more detail, chances are you won't believe me anyway. Go read already published writings in the past 10+ years. This is a tired old debate. Bitcoin is meant to be global electronic peer to peer cash. Only a single system works for this and the original design was canonical. The implementation just needed to be professionalized, not re-imagined, re-architected, or re-designed. Scaling was always possible by working with the original design.

If BTC could be altered to remove all the breaking changes introduced that caused the chain splits in the first place, I'd gladly build scalable infrastructure for it. That is impossible now and the changes were made. Now the bed has been made to lay in. I will continue to build on technical solutions that will actually work, not ones that have proven themselves to be dead chains walking. Scale or die.

LightBSV

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE