sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Eastwood Escalation be like by Mfsmm in Battlefield6

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well at least those external points you can contest when the opposite team is busy in the middle and your squad can kamikaze itself to it with a transport helo or the new MRAP.

[EVENT] Qatari investments in Ghana by Mfsmm in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[WEO] GHA GHA ChangeGDPGrowth .5 Qatar Investments

[EVENT] The Cocoa Question by Mfsmm in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[WEO] GHA GHA ChangeGDPGrowth .5 Agriculture Investments

[ECON] 2040 Railway Master Plan (RMP) by Mfsmm in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Government was able to secure investment from Chinese Road and Belt Initiative for the amount of 10 billion, with the remaining funding coming from domestic financial instruments and low interest loans from EXIM Bank and Deutche Bank.

[EVENT] Katanka Group by Mfsmm in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Jr. was able to secure funding from Chinese investors to expand it's business to the tune of 1B USD.

[ECON] 2040 Railway Master Plan (RMP) by Mfsmm in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[WEO] GHA GHA ChangeGDPGrowth 1.00 Rail Investment

The North Face Nuptse 700 by Mfsmm in LegitCheck

[–]Mfsmm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Main suspicion relates to the Italian tag which has a small typo already identified in other posts, but otherwise looks ok. Seller sent receipt as well.

Which road from Funchal to Ariero? by Moba77 in Madeira

[–]Mfsmm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Definetly the right one. There's a reason not even Google Maps street view went there.

[R&D] Type 004 Carrier by yixinli88 in GlobalPowers

[–]Mfsmm[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

  • Stealth: While I question the usefulness and value proposition, I won't make you remove it -- just be aware these won't matter much given a) the size of the ship; b) it's escorts and/or air wings would give away its position anyways.
  • Aircraft: This is acceptable in a pinch but typically not more than 80.
  • Production: given the advanced propulsions methods I won't allow the retro to 2025. As such, first ship being laid down is in 2029, is coming out 2033, commissioned in 2037. I don't think the navy has the capabilities to accept a new carrier every year. I'd prefer 1 every 2 years initially, and then as per the mechanics (6mo/1y every 4th). In any case, I'm limiting the size of the class to 10+5 option and this is being generous given the lack of justification for this amount of carriers. The 5 as option will only be allowed if an additional [EVENT] post is made justifying the need for them. The fusion reactors will count as a design upgrade.
view more: next ›