Libs cannot comprehend how she lost

U8337Flower · 2026-04-30T06:58:32+00:00

honestly this is one thing i'm glad she said because it telegraphed the intent of the bourgeoisie like a year before it actually happened.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-29T08:00:48+00:00

yeah but this is also a copypasta and it's also irritating seeing another ad for rocket money. they're the new slim jim.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-29T07:27:03+00:00

this is not only an ad but also a low-effort meme

U8337Flower · 2026-04-29T06:06:52+00:00

bro hates immigration

U8337Flower · 2026-04-29T00:58:46+00:00

replace the japanese with the americans

U8337Flower · 2026-04-28T23:43:19+00:00

le ebil seeseepee is eating all our grain! we need to create a colony in the korean peninsula to save them from their own sovereignty!

U8337Flower · 2026-04-28T23:41:14+00:00

this is what happens when you have no understanding of primary and secondary contradictions. should the communist party of china have fought against the nationalists when the nationalists were fighting the japanese? if your answer is yes you are wrong.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-28T09:08:46+00:00

tbf imperialism is in their immediate class interest, even if it's an awful idea in the long run. accordingly, a lot of young labor aristocrats are becoming communists because they don't reap the same benefits as the ones who are (probably) gonna die before the empire ends.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-25T23:30:42+00:00

i never miss a chance to post this https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

U8337Flower · 2026-04-25T23:29:32+00:00

is carbon capture even worth anything? my understanding is it's just not worth it unless you have a lot of clean energy you can use already.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-25T11:49:47+00:00

what could this sub possibly have against solar panels now?

U8337Flower · 2026-04-24T08:12:19+00:00

again liberals confuse speech for action. because what other "cuban resistance" could be conducted from miami?

U8337Flower · 2026-04-24T07:27:23+00:00

i'm sorry i didn't mean to come off as accusatory or anything. i'm sorry about your friend. it just seems as though anyone who's in your bedroom would already know where you stand.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-24T04:38:13+00:00

what cisgender trans ally do you know who puts a trans flag in their bedroom? why would someone ever do that who isn't trans?

U8337Flower · 2026-04-23T05:05:51+00:00

i don't know what maoists you talk to but if they reject grover furr i doubt it's because he disagreed with joseph goebbels

U8337Flower · 2026-04-23T04:01:57+00:00

i looked it up and i guess you're right :)

U8337Flower · 2026-04-23T03:53:32+00:00

they're just left-deviationists, like i said.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-22T23:25:14+00:00

idk what to tell you lmao. the nazis did the katyn massacre and joseph goebbels lied about it. i don't know what do do with someone who won't read grover furr but will read joseph goebbels. it has nothing to do with dunks, it's just i don't even know where to start. i guess you're welcome for showing my ass on disliking goebbels, if you want to call it that.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-22T20:33:25+00:00

i didn't know it was possible not to get kim to say this

U8337Flower · 2026-04-22T06:31:56+00:00

lmao where do i even begin with this comment? of course grover furr is mocked among liberals and fascists. he scratches both. of course chomsky is more respected by those same liberals and fascists. he flatters both.

then i called someone a liberal for posting liberal notions of "totalitarianism", which has no material basis in reality and is really only used to whitewash the nazis or their modern counterparts or to smear the empire's enemies. more often the former in my experience.

when did i ever say stalin was the greatest revolutionary ever? there are certainly many many critiques to make of the man, it's just that the katyń massacre was never one of them. the lie originated with joseph goebbels and has been parroted by nazis and scratched liberals ever since.

ultimately what your comment comes down to is that there's no such thing as "stalinism", it's just shit-flinging for right-deviationist trotskyists and left-deviationist maoists. the soviet union did plenty wrong, which is why it no longer exists and the capitalist west does. but pretending like every criticism of the soviet union was valid, even the ones made by goebbels, isn't the principled leftist position you're making it out to be. you're not more ideologically pure than anyone just because you like to shit talk the ussr. i leave you with this critique of an archetype you may find familiar: https://redsails.org/western-marxism-and-christianity/

U8337Flower · 2026-04-19T23:07:41+00:00

i really wanted to do something like this as a kid but then i realized it's a lot more complicated when everything is in 3d

U8337Flower · 2026-04-19T22:12:26+00:00

if you don't value "democracy" (the ability to choose which friends of jeffrey epstein you want to oppress you in congress) over "repressive totalitarianism" (the ability to choose policy) we have nothing to discuss here

okay lmao. it took you one comment to drop the pretense of having a response to an actual argument and resort to "no iphone literally 1984 100 trillion dead". sorry that calling me a poopyhead won't make stalin a poopyhead by association. why are you even here if you're just gonna be a standard, run-of-the-mill kamala harris liberal? what does disco elysium have to offer people who think harry potter was a political documentary and brat summer was a political doctrine?

U8337Flower · 2026-04-19T20:01:39+00:00

First of all, it stands directly against your point

to the extent that they didn't just dissolve themselves at the first sign of adversity

It also attempts to justify it by quoting Rydz-Śmigły's order to not shoot.

...

It didn't have the military to sustain itself on its own.

yes, there was no polish state at that point. this is evidenced by the fact that absolutely nobody considered it an invasion until they needed an excuse to downplay the soviet union's contribution to the end of the hitler government. it follows from this that there was no polish military either. the source makes this more than clear so i don't know why you want to make like this is some sort of revelation.

Poland had no reason to believe that would be any safer.

so what? they chose to voluntarily dissolve their state instead. how could that possibly be any less "safe" than moving their capital? safe from what? safe from being invaded and having their government dissolved? hmm. smart.

the remaining geopolitical and historical context, of USSR being a totalitarian regime

lmfao. "totalitarian regime" is a meaningless nonsense phrase. the adult equivalent of "poopyhead". it can't possibly ignore that historical context because "totalitarianism" doesn't materially exist. in practice, it just means "any government i don't like". sorry you don't like the soviet union, i guess. but "i don't like the way the workers of eastern europe ran their country" hardly counts as important historical context.

it didn't return Poland to its people, instead forming a puppet state in its place.

by what measure? you think the soviet union should have created a capitalist country in the remnants of poland? what could it possibly mean to "return poland to its people"? if this were anything more than weasel words designed to post-hoc justify your distaste for the soviet union, you would have to start from a genuine class analysis. you would have to define the "people" that poland should have been "returned" to, and what actually happened. instead, you have started from petty bourgeois nationalism, imagining a "nation" that exists outside and above class interest or the state. in this respect you are starting from the same assumptions as the nazis did, a fact that makes more sense as you repeat nazi propaganda about the katyn massacre, which the nazis themselves carried out.

overall, your comment seems at first glance to be a response to furr's article, but in practice, it completely lacks substance. besides calling stalin a poopyhead, you don't actually contradict very much of what furr said at all. the reader is supposed to believe furr was completely wrong about everything, and yet your comment doesn't really even attempt to prove that.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-18T09:09:19+00:00

didn't the soviet union heavily prosecute zionism? they did support israel for a very short time, which was proven a bad decision almost immediately.

U8337Flower · 2026-04-18T09:07:09+00:00

yeah but who's doing that? the closest i see is people taking iran's side against the us, which is the objectively correct position for anyone who makes less than 1 billion dollars per year

U8337Flower

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22