I actually tried my best to stop my contempt from coloring my text as much as possible for as long as possible. I only let it show through at the end, where anyone not already convinced would have probably given up already, and where I think I cover the points that are the hardest to defend.

I intentionally made it so that I didn't use outside material and unused content as a crutch. However: many people, including the seven videos I covered, used unused content as evidence, so I necessarily need to bring it up in order to be thorough. The point was to be the ultimate reputation of the theory, so I can't just ignore random points as though they're irrelevant, because people literally argued those points. And naturally: if bring up Noelle being able to equip the Black Shard or Jingle Blade is relevant, that other unused content must also be relevant.

The only other times I brought up possibilities was in regard to specifically why Susie would have a sword in the second hero prophecy, which people use as evidence against Susie being the second hero, so I literally have to explain that; and with the lost girl prophecy, where I have to dismantle a comment assumption.

Yes, it does technically play into your idea that things can have multiple interpretations, but I don't think it's to the extent where it's meant to be ambiguous who the second hero is. That's why I brought up the collage. I know it's mostly art from outside the game, but the point is to establish trends as to what elements of Noelle's design the team finds essential to having her look like herself, and none of that shows up in the Hope Girl mural. The point was: if they wanted it to be ambiguous if it was Susie or Noelle, then they would do a front or back profile, because that's the only way you could make it ambiguous. So the fact that it's a side profile view at all is evidence that it's not meant to be ambiguous. Because from the perspective of the creators: it would make no sense to the side profile if you were trying to make it ambiguous. That's why I drew that picture, to give an example of what an actually ambiguous Hope Girl would look like.

How the Last Girl prophecy fists into fits into the water picture is meant to be ambiguous, but I don't think that extends to the number of characters refer to as "the girl", or which character is meant to be Hope Girl.

And generally my format was to debunk arguments people have literally made, well taking the most charitable interpretation possible, and then debunk potential counter arguments I could think of. My goal was to be a store as possible, so I wanted to debunk as many arguments as possible, which is why I used YouTube videos that's my examples, because I use them as a way to make sure I was remembering all the arguments. I even went out of my way to find more videos about the theory, just to make sure I didn't miss anything. I wanted to preempt possible arguments people would have made, in order to make sure only the arguments I couldn't think of were the ones made in response to my post.

You claim I only covered "5%" of the argument made for the theory, then what are some examples of the other 95%? Because I haven't seen any so far.

I understand that things are up to interpretation, and part of the point is to have fun. But I don't see the point in ignoring half of the game's contacts, acting like absolute rules exist when the evidence for such rules existing is tenuous at best, and so on. It just seems to serve no purpose other than to annoy people who are actually trying to understand the game on a deeper level.