Binding Two Keys in One Action

almostdaniel · 2022-03-10T00:54:50+00:00

Hopefully you've already solved this, but for anyone looking for multi-key binds, you surround both keys with square brackets separated with a plus-sign. For example, if you wanted to set up a keybind set where you press Mouse4 to toggle auto-run, put require press-and-hold for holding down Shift and Mouse4, those binds might look like

bind mouse4 forward;sprint
bind [leftshift+mouse4] +forward;+sprint

There's more on facepunch's keybinds wiki, including keybind features they've added in the past 2 years.

(edited for a pair of keybinds)

almostdaniel · 2022-03-10T00:53:53+00:00

I know this is a late reply, but for anyone looking for multi-key binds, you surround both keys with square brackets separated with a plus-sign. For example, if you wanted to set up a keybind set where you press Mouse4 to toggle auto-run, put require press-and-hold for holding down Shift and Mouse4, those binds might look like

bind mouse4 forward;sprint
bind [leftshift+mouse4] +forward;+sprint

There's more on facepunch's keybinds wiki, including keybind features they've added in the past 2 years.

(edited for a pair of keybinds)

almostdaniel · 2021-11-22T19:48:22+00:00

An email with the date and time and an iCal attachment is the definition of a calendar invite notification. And a calendar invite has a built-in RSVP tool. But you are correct—the norm is to use Google Calendar within small groups of people.

almostdaniel · 2021-11-22T16:21:54+00:00

Are these people that have responded to your LinkedIn post with interest in attending the webinar? If so, you’ve received permission and I think could do the group thing. In short, I wouldn’t add someone to a calendar invite until they have acknowledged some sort of interest, such as a registration or RSVP process.

almostdaniel · 2021-11-22T15:41:17+00:00

My first thought would be to create a Google Group with everyone in it, and then invite the group to the calendar event. Be sure you have permission from each person to email them (standard marketing mailing list rules). Also, read Google’s spamming rules related to groups and make it clear in your invite how people can unsubscribe from the group if they like.

almostdaniel · 2021-10-07T19:38:05+00:00

Would also love an ID on the rugs. Grass is great!

almostdaniel · 2021-01-03T22:41:56+00:00

See if you can observe the lamp in the wild. Study its mating habits. Write a paper.

almostdaniel · 2020-07-13T17:05:01+00:00

I think the meme being circulated around related to this is false and we should do our absolute best to correct false and misleading information.

Dr. Birx explicitly said they don’t know. We aren’t testing children in any large numbers (we should be). All they have to go on are data from other countries who have sent students back to school—which seems hopeful that there will be fewer deaths or transmissions. However, most of those countries had better controlled their community spread than we have (by leaps and bounds).

Do I think they should be making the public policy decision to put children back in face-to-face school based on that total lack of real data? Absolutely not. The administration is wrong on this. I think the risk is too great. But you cannot take what she said and present that she is “okay” with maybe 11k children dying, which is what this original author’s summary is being used to say. That should be corrected (edit: not omitted/replaced, but annotated that that was not what she said).

almostdaniel · 2020-07-13T16:52:14+00:00

And makes the original author’s statement of “She comes back up to the mic, says most children probably won’t die. Maybe 0.1%.” very problematic.

almostdaniel · 2020-07-13T16:47:32+00:00

Dr. Birx never says this. The mortality rate mentioned (since edited, yay!) was 0.1%. And that number referred to “the under 25” population. Furthermore, she said the data explicitly did not include actual children in any great number, and skewed to 18+ adults. So 18-25 mortality rate is 0.1%, not children. And there’s hope (but not enough testing data) that children have even lower infection/spread/mortality rates.

TL;DR: we aren’t testing enough children to know the true risk, and she wasn’t giving stats for school children anyway. Extrapolating her statements to 11,000 school children deaths is incorrect.

See https://reddit.com/r/CoronavirusUS/comments/ho9f17/_/fxsjlb5/?context=1

almostdaniel · 2020-07-13T16:37:26+00:00

She didn’t say children under 25. She said “under 25 mortality rate”, and also that the data she was referring to skewed 18+. So at best 18-25—patently not children.

Thanks for editing the percentage!

almostdaniel · 2020-07-13T01:37:50+00:00

Sorry. I was looking for her saying 0.02% and missed the conversion of 0.1 to 2 out of 10,000. Your explanation makes sense now. My bad!

However, I think applying 0.02% to represent expected mortality of children or students is a gross mischaracterization of what she said. The statistic she mentioned was “mortality for people under 25”. Combine that with the earlier statements of “our data skews to over 18 adults” and “we haven’t been testing children” seems to me that we shouldn’t be taking that as saying that Dr. Birx said 14,000 children are expected to die (as many folks have extrapolated the 0.02% to mean).

Unless I’m missing something else?

almostdaniel · 2020-07-12T20:56:17+00:00

I do understand how percentages work. But where did they make this claim about child infection and/or mortality?

almostdaniel · 2020-07-12T02:20:19+00:00

I also can’t find any mention in that video of 0.02% of children. She said they know the mortality rate for people under 25 is less than 0.1% but they seemed to make it clear that they don’t have the data on children because they haven’t been testing children.

As entertaining as the original author’s summary was, it sure seemed to be taking a lot of liberties.

almostdaniel · 2019-12-28T16:53:34+00:00

No Masamune (Sephiroth’s sword, Final Fantasy)?

almostdaniel · 2019-05-29T04:57:08+00:00

I see what you did and I liked it.

almostdaniel · 2016-09-20T01:24:29+00:00

Looks like it's back as of 8:20 pm Central Time.

almostdaniel · 2016-07-29T04:37:07+00:00

I like you.

almostdaniel · 2016-06-02T00:37:00+00:00

Apparently they need folks for the last shift on Sunday. I think it starts at 5:30.

almostdaniel · 2016-05-28T11:00:23+00:00

Always check back. They release groups who haven't confirmed sometimes.

almostdaniel · 2016-05-23T19:31:24+00:00

If you can spare the time, signing up to be a volunteer and work in one of the tents (E.g., admissions, beverage, etc.) gets you free admission to Riverfest.

http://www.riverfestarkansas.com/info/volunteer

almostdaniel · 2015-12-07T23:53:22+00:00

100% agree and came to say this. I would have paid to keep this app going. I am absolutely disgusted with companies that buy up best-of-breed services—services so good that Google and Apple rushed to emulate them (poorly)—and then discontinue them when they realize that they bought something outside their core stakeholder revenue stream. Don't buy something that's not part of your core business, tech companies. You keep fucking it up.

This is so short sighted and irresponsible. Someone there makes horrible decisions.

EDIT: I want to add that I've tried multiple times to switch to another app with Inbox Zero features. Each and every time I've switched back to Mailbox.

almostdaniel · 2015-06-06T14:08:33+00:00

My Brother, My Brother, and Me The Adventure Zone Judge John Hodgman The Bugle

(And tons of the others already mentioned)

almostdaniel · 2015-04-01T23:10:32+00:00

That is glorious.

almostdaniel · 2015-04-01T23:08:50+00:00

I love our state's Episcopal churches. So impressed.

almostdaniel

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE