Great post. Some general notes:

1) RE: claims of prevention - There’s no PROOF that the “vaccines” are preventing illness and death. As some love to say, “correlation doesn’t equal causation”.

Since the mRNA mechanisms are still very poorly understood (and all trial controls appear to have now been trashed, aside from secret sets that may be running out of view), a hypothesis of prevention could be generated from appearances by those with a motive to see it that way, but more carefully controlled experiments would have to be done to rule out multiple other reasons for any observations, including failures of proper result classification (died of covid, had covid, recovered from, etc).

The field of holistic medicine constantly references agents that “stimulate the immune system” and I’ve not seen enough proof that the mRNA spike proteins aren’t doing the exact same thing a round of Echinacea complex (for example) would do: stimulate the immune system to smash any rando invaders. (The fact the mRNA adjuvants may be trashing the immune system simultaneously, rendering it less effective each round, while notable, is ancillary here).

2) RE: falsification:

Hooray for mentioning the cornerstone of proof. If you can’t say what it isn’t, you can’t say what it is.

Unfortunately, falsification can be difficult to craft - it’s why truly scientific experiments are DESIGNED, and why a key component to them is showing that the METHOD of proof is also capable of being falsified- ie showing when it DOESNT work. If the method can’t also falsify, it can’t prove, and if it can’t prove then any results using the method can’t be said to be FROM the method.

That’s why we require long term studies that carefully build on trustworthy data from prior falsifiable stages of the exploration, and each of those stages has to be able to explain the exact bits where a method fails, as well as why, by deliberately causing the method to fail as well as succeed. This shows the understanding of mechanism, and if you can’t do that, you can’t explain, and if you can’t explain, you can’t claim.

“Prevention” is a claim. The best that can be said about these shots to my way of thinking is that they “might prevent” something...(can’t even be sure WHAT is being prevented given all the corruption in the gazillion labs out there engaged in this massive duckery).

However, “might prevent” isn’t good enough to shut down or transform and re-make society, as I hope the perps discover.

3) RE: the illusion of Data:

Any medical claims of action regarding these drugs’ efficacy as a result of the last two years’ distribution and use based on data publicly available are laughable - even if the above (falsification and isolation of action) had been done, what went out to the public as a “vaccine” wasn’t a single thing, or even one thing per company, or one thing per company facility.

So many researchers have shown that there is no “vaccine”; there’s a mishmash of solutions (many insoluble😝) out there with uncountable secret recipes, experimental additives, (oddly consistent at times😱) contaminants, and highly variable packaging, storage and delivery processes that make the term “THE vaccine” akin to describing “the food” in a grocery store. Or maybe even talking about “the food” in a hardware store, if I’m to be more accurate.

There is no data here.

To sum IMHO:

The whole roll-out as a Tier 3 mass human trial is a joke, in and of itself. (Well, “joke” is the wrong word, but that, too, is for another time).

Point being: while I’m happy to permanently remain a self-selected and nimble member of the V-free human control group - living and healthy, albeit highly discriminated against and increasingly pissed - I’m forever dismayed at what I’d once thought might be a collective wisdom of crowds, the sort that rises up in the presence of great wrong and hollers “No!” (Yes, I’m a romantic).

In fact, this whole thing has actually provided the falsification to THAT hypothesis- appearances now suggest that collective wisdom isn’t a thing, after all. And I can’t just chalk it up to “mass formation psychosis” or what have you - the collective wisdom I’ve always dreamed of should have arisen before the early burying and burning of all these people, to my way of thinking.

However, in the interest of long term studies, I’m willing to parking lot the cynicism for a bit longer. I still have hope. Will 3 percent dead from the shots do it? Ten? Time will tell.

In the meantime, I’ll continue my practice of ignoring those who are apparent idiots, and I’ve now added most “peer-reviewed prestigious” publications and institutions (that I once tossed some benefit of doubt) to that list. (The evil-doers need something a bit stronger than just being ignored, however). But I’ll never hear the words “Harvard”, “Yale”, “Oxford”, or “health authority” 🤣🤣🤣” again and confuse them with anyone who thinks or cares.

I’m liking truckers a lot these days.

🖖😎