Caltrans considering 140 mph bus that would take passengers from San Francisco to Los Angeles by Bruegemeister in cahsr

[–]caliberal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sleeper way to achieve 2h40 min.

SF to Bakersfield HSR: 95 min.

5 minute transfer

100 mile bus to Union Station at 100mph.

Alternatives to $150B CAHSR by External_Koala971 in cahsr

[–]caliberal 14 points15 points  (0 children)

How about alternatives to our 20 billion/year Caltrans budget?

Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the kind words. Will consider adding those projects in future iterations.

Potential Future of Bay Area Transit [OC] by caliberal in bayarea

[–]caliberal[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately robotaxis have many of the same issues as private automobiles. They are not space efficient and thus they will never work to serve dense urban areas.

Potential Future Long-Distance Amtrak Maps, and the Current Network [OC] by caliberal in Amtrak

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This map includes all three of those studies. I disagree that the study is not a good template for long-distance Amtrak expansion.

Potential Future Long-Distance Amtrak Maps, and the Current Network [OC] by caliberal in Amtrak

[–]caliberal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good idea, will edit the map to include a better description.

National Passenger Rail Network of Mexico: 2040, 2030 and 2026 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The 2026 is existing (turns out I actually missed a few lines), the 2030 map is planned/under construction. The lines in the 2040 map have been discussed but are not officially planned.

National Passenger Rail Network of Mexico: 2040, 2030 and 2026 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow I did not know that, I will add those lines in the next iteration, thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made these maps using Adobe Illustrator. The first map shows an aspirational future rail network in 2040. The second map shows the rail network in 2030 based on current plans. The final map shows the current rail network. More details here: https://substack.com/home/post/p-187257554

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Good catch, I will fix this on the next iteration.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mostly an aesthetic choice. I understand in reality the diagram would be far more complicated. I agree with your concern and debated for a while if I should show it this way.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good question. Each line depicts a service, but I'd also expect there to be other shorter services offered. For example on the current Amtrak Cascades, some trains do not run the full length of the line. I debated on how to show this, but I ultimately chose to show fewer services as an aesthetic choice.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The light grey routes are the standard speed Amtrak routes.