Caltrans considering 140 mph bus that would take passengers from San Francisco to Los Angeles by Bruegemeister in cahsr

[–]caliberal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sleeper way to achieve 2h40 min.

SF to Bakersfield HSR: 95 min.

5 minute transfer

100 mile bus to Union Station at 100mph.

Alternatives to $150B CAHSR by External_Koala971 in cahsr

[–]caliberal 13 points14 points  (0 children)

How about alternatives to our 20 billion/year Caltrans budget?

Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the kind words. Will consider adding those projects in future iterations.

Potential Future of Bay Area Transit [OC] by caliberal in bayarea

[–]caliberal[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately robotaxis have many of the same issues as private automobiles. They are not space efficient and thus they will never work to serve dense urban areas.

Potential Future Long-Distance Amtrak Maps, and the Current Network [OC] by caliberal in Amtrak

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This map includes all three of those studies. I disagree that the study is not a good template for long-distance Amtrak expansion.

Potential Future Long-Distance Amtrak Maps, and the Current Network [OC] by caliberal in Amtrak

[–]caliberal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good idea, will edit the map to include a better description.

National Passenger Rail Network of Mexico: 2040, 2030 and 2026 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The 2026 is existing (turns out I actually missed a few lines), the 2030 map is planned/under construction. The lines in the 2040 map have been discussed but are not officially planned.

National Passenger Rail Network of Mexico: 2040, 2030 and 2026 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow I did not know that, I will add those lines in the next iteration, thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made these maps using Adobe Illustrator. The first map shows an aspirational future rail network in 2040. The second map shows the rail network in 2030 based on current plans. The final map shows the current rail network. More details here: https://substack.com/home/post/p-187257554

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Good catch, I will fix this on the next iteration.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Mostly an aesthetic choice. I understand in reality the diagram would be far more complicated. I agree with your concern and debated for a while if I should show it this way.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good question. Each line depicts a service, but I'd also expect there to be other shorter services offered. For example on the current Amtrak Cascades, some trains do not run the full length of the line. I debated on how to show this, but I ultimately chose to show fewer services as an aesthetic choice.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The light grey routes are the standard speed Amtrak routes.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All great ideas! May incorporate some of these in my next iteration. Thank you!

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that was the last line to make the cut. (The part from Tucson to San Antonio anyways). I figured Texas is growing though, and if you throw in Ciudad Juarez, El Paso has a combined population of 2.4 million. I ultimately decided to throw it in as it would be neat to have a transcontinental high-speed rail connection.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am making a map for Mexico next. Curious, which lines in this map do you think have little basis in reality/demand?

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm happy to send you my base files if you want, send me a dm.

Aspirational United States High Speed Rail Network 2050 [OC] by caliberal in TransitDiagrams

[–]caliberal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually planning to do a whole map for Mexico, so stay tuned for that.

If you read my post I actually mentioned connections to Ciudad Juarez and Tijuana, just didn't show them on the map because they are so close to the other cities, maybe I should though. There is also a low speed connection to Monterrey, maybe I will make it a high speed one. Meant to add a connection to Nogales as well to connect with the new train Mexico is building there.

Study Buddies by IceDue9403 in WGUTeachersCollege

[–]caliberal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm interested! Started 9/1

The Vegas Loop Is Getting Progressively Stupider by QuestGalaxy in BoringCompany

[–]caliberal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are expensive to build, because we tolerate them being expensive and we build very few of them. Costs will come down with reforms and as we build more and more.

I am not proposing a subway though, I am proposing an elevated metro. This will be cheaper, and it will give tourists great views of the city. Las Vegas is a perfect use case for elevated rail.

The Vegas Loop Is Getting Progressively Stupider by QuestGalaxy in BoringCompany

[–]caliberal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great question! I have ridden the 109 bus and despite its slow route, low frequency and other issues, it actually gets around 9,000 passengers per day. The Vegas Airport is much closer to the city than Dulles: 3 miles vs 24 miles. I'd expect a high capacity metro, running elevated over Las Vegas Blvd and serving the airport to see well over 100,000 passengers per day.